Workgroup to revise the Best Practices for TEI in Libraries

2015-12-18T23:57:13Z

Arouner: added email address

* [https://list.indiana.edu/sympa/arc/teilib-l/2015-11/msg00006.html Invitation to participate]
* Members
** Kevin Hawkins (kevin.s.hawkins)
** stuart yeates ()
** stefanie gehrke (stefanie.gehrke9@gmail.com)
** Elli Mylonas (elli_mylonas@brown.edu)
** James Griffin III ()
** Lisa McAulay ()
** Martin Mueller ()
** Michelle Dalmau ()
** Antonio Rojas ()
** Paul Schaffner (pfspfs@gmail.com [or pfs@umich.edu])
** Peter Gorman ()
** Andrew Rouner (andrew.rouner@gmail.com)

[[Category:SIG:Libraries]]

TEI Tite

2008-06-18T16:29:17Z

Arouner: /* TEI Tite: Issues Under Consideration */

[[Category: SIG:Libraries]]
[http://www.tei-c.org/wiki/index.php/SIG:Libraries TEI in Libraries: Home]

==TEI Tite: Issues Under Consideration==

* [[Review of Tite Scheme]]

Sorry my post is somewhat belated, given the survey has already gone out. But I wanted to raise one issue with tite--not with the scheme per se, but with it possible customization.

My understanding is that this is a tool which can be used to approach a vendor to obtain a discount for TEI members.

I also understand that as it stands now, this would not be customizable. My question is: would the discount from vendors be achievable mainly by virtue of the simplified set-up of markup, or by virtue of the (potential) size of the group? I assume both achieve some savings. However, when I look at work we might want to submit to such a service, we would want customization in tagging for any of those--but with significant overlap with TEI lite. If we get (theoretically) 50% of potential savings by virtue of the group, and 50% by virtue of using a single scheme, couldn't we still achieve 80% savings by allowing for ''some'' customization?

TEIWiki - User contributions [en]

Workgroup to revise the Best Practices for TEI in Libraries

TEI Tite