Ad-hoc committee on encoding of bibliographic citations - Revision history

Kshawkin: /* Proposed revisions to P5 presented Dublin */ copyediting

2014-10-04T18:37:10Z

‎Proposed revisions to P5 presented Dublin: copyediting

2014-10-04T18:36:41Z

2013-07-02T02:07:10Z

‎Proposed future revisions to the Guidelines (which will break backwards compatibility): now a div1-level section

2013-07-02T02:06:47Z

‎Way forward: renamed to "Work undertaken"

2013-07-02T01:56:25Z

‎Way forward: last of pending work for P5 now complete

2013-04-06T20:43:45Z

noted which pending work is no longer pending

2013-01-28T19:49:49Z

‎Pending work: copyediting, new ticket arising from TEI-L discussion

2013-01-28T16:55:45Z

‎Pending work

2013-01-28T16:46:48Z

‎Pending work

2013-01-27T21:05:05Z

‎Pending work: added 3602308

@@ Line 59: / Line 59: @@
 = Work undertaken =
-== Proposed revisions to P5 presented Dublin ==
+== Proposed revisions to P5 presented in Dublin ==
 Martin, Laurent, and Kevin prepared a proposal for revisions to [http://www.tei-c.org/release/doc/tei-p5-doc/en/html/CO.html#COBI §3.11] and [http://www.tei-c.org/release/doc/tei-p5-doc/en/html/HD.html#HD8 §2.7] for consideration by the TEI Council during its meeting in Dublin in April 2010.

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:36, 4 October 2014
Line 133:		Line 133:

	c. Get rid of biblStruct and possibly also biblFull altogether since they are bound to cause problems for complex citations. Perhaps even prescribe use of BibTeXML [http://bibtexml.sourceforge.net/] [http://dret.net/projects/bibtexml/] or another XML format (or even [http://www.bibjson.org/ BibJSON]) for use with citations instead of TEI's elements. Such elements would used the other scheme's namespace within a TEI document, much like MathML or SVG can be used in P5, and TEI would leave the other markup language to deal with bibliographies and focus on the things it does better.		c. Get rid of biblStruct and possibly also biblFull altogether since they are bound to cause problems for complex citations. Perhaps even prescribe use of BibTeXML [http://bibtexml.sourceforge.net/] [http://dret.net/projects/bibtexml/] or another XML format (or even [http://www.bibjson.org/ BibJSON]) for use with citations instead of TEI's elements. Such elements would used the other scheme's namespace within a TEI document, much like MathML or SVG can be used in P5, and TEI would leave the other markup language to deal with bibliographies and focus on the things it does better.
		+
		+	[[Category:Council]]

@@ Line 93: / Line 93: @@
 A related topic arose on TEI-L: [http://purl.org/TEI/FR/3602428 3602428: biblScope@unit & citedRange@unit: consistency & sugg. values] -- implemented
-== Proposed future revisions to the Guidelines (which will break backwards compatibility) ==
+= Proposed future revisions to the Guidelines (which will break backwards compatibility) =
 Examine content model for biblStruct and citations standards like Z39.29 derived from ISBD.  Consider introducing revisions that would break backwards compatibility, such as the following:

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:06, 2 July 2013
Line 57:		Line 57:


−	= ~~Way forward~~ =	+	= Work undertaken =

	== Proposed revisions to P5 presented Dublin ==		== Proposed revisions to P5 presented Dublin ==

@@ Line 91: / Line 91: @@
 * [http://purl.org/TEI/FR/3602416 3602416: expansion of markup in a bibl example] -- implemented
-== Pending work ==
+A related topic arose on TEI-L: [http://purl.org/TEI/FR/3602428 3602428: biblScope@unit & citedRange@unit: consistency & sugg. values] -- implemented
 == Proposed future revisions to the Guidelines (which will break backwards compatibility) ==

@@ Line 84: / Line 84: @@
 Some more revisions based on the Dublin proposal were also made in the course of implementing [http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=3585939&group_id=106328&atid=644062 3585939: <title level="s"> in a <monogr>]: see http://tei.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/tei/trunk/P5/Source/Guidelines/en/CO-CoreElements.xml?r1=11278&r2=11277&pathrev=11278 .
-== Pending work ==
+The committee members returned to their proposal made in Dublin to see if any revisions were still needed to the relevant chapters of the Guidelines.  Tickets have been created for the remaining work:
-The committee members will return to their proposal made in Dublin to see if any revisions are still needed to the relevant chapters of the Guidelines.  Tickets have been created for the remaining work:
+* [http://purl.org/TEI/BUG/3602256 3602256: title of section 3.11.1 (#COBITY)] -- implemented
-* [http://purl.org/TEI/BUG/3602256 3602256: title of section 3.11.1 (#COBITY)]
+== Pending work ==
-In addition, one topic arose on TEI-L and needs addressing: [http://purl.org/TEI/FR/3602428 3602428: biblScope@unit & citedRange@unit: consistency & sugg. values]
+One topic arose on TEI-L and needs addressing: [http://purl.org/TEI/FR/3602428 3602428: biblScope@unit & citedRange@unit: consistency & sugg. values]
 == Proposed future revisions to the Guidelines (which will break backwards compatibility) ==

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:05, 27 January 2013
Line 89:		Line 89:

	* [http://purl.org/TEI/BUG/3602256 3602256: title of section 3.11.1 (#COBITY)]		* [http://purl.org/TEI/BUG/3602256 3602256: title of section 3.11.1 (#COBITY)]
		+	* [http://purl.org/TEI/FR/3602308 3602308: transcription in national cataloguing codes wrt fileDesc]

	== Proposed future revisions to the Guidelines (which will break backwards compatibility) ==		== Proposed future revisions to the Guidelines (which will break backwards compatibility) ==