Alternatives - Revision history

Piotr Banski: + category

2009-03-20T13:41:56Z

+ category

Elenap: /* Alternatives */

2009-03-19T15:48:12Z

‎Alternatives

Elenap: /* Alternatives */

2009-03-19T15:47:22Z

‎Alternatives

Elenap: /* Alternatives */

2009-03-19T15:46:38Z

‎Alternatives

Elenap: New page: == Alternatives == * Authors often record different alternatives for the same passage * the dimension of the alternatives ranges from the single word (or part) to blocks (see Vetter & McD...

2009-03-19T15:41:24Z

New page: == Alternatives == * Authors often record different alternatives for the same passage * the dimension of the alternatives ranges from the single word (or part) to blocks (see Vetter & McD...

New page

== Alternatives ==

* Authors often record different alternatives for the same passage
* the dimension of the alternatives ranges from the single word (or part) to blocks (see Vetter & McDonald 2003)
*

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:41, 20 March 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	[[category:Genetic Editions]]
	== Alternatives ==		== Alternatives ==

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 * Authors often record different alternatives for the same passage
-* the dimension of the alternatives ranges from the single word (or part) to blocks (see Vetter & McDonald 2003)
+* the scope of the alternatives ranges from single word (or part) to blocks (see Vetter & McDonald 2003)
-* we need a mechanism able to cope with different level of alternation, similar (if not the same) to http://www.tei-c.org/release/doc/tei-p5-doc/en/html/ref-alt.html
+* we need a mechanism able to cope with different dimensions of alternation, similar (if not the same) to http://www.tei-c.org/release/doc/tei-p5-doc/en/html/ref-alt.html
 * respect the <alt/> element, we need also a system to declare the evidence of editorial/authorial choices. For instance in some cases we can say which alternative was preferred by the author because the text is underlined or has other functional marks (see again Vetter & McDonald 2003), or because in later draft we have evidence that one reading has been preferred
 * The proposal is therefore to create a new element or to add an attribute to <alt/> in order to link to a functional mark or an editorial discussion about a specific point.

@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 * we need a mechanism able to cope with different level of alternation, similar (if not the same) to http://www.tei-c.org/release/doc/tei-p5-doc/en/html/ref-alt.html
 * respect the <alt/> element, we need also a system to declare the evidence of editorial/authorial choices. For instance in some cases we can say which alternative was preferred by the author because the text is underlined or has other functional marks (see again Vetter & McDonald 2003), or because in later draft we have evidence that one reading has been preferred
-  * The proposal is therefore to create a new element or to add an attribute to <alt/> in order to link to a functional mark or an editorial discussion about a specific point.
+* The proposal is therefore to create a new element or to add an attribute to <alt/> in order to link to a functional mark or an editorial discussion about a specific point.