Minutes from January 27, 2009 - Revision history

Syd: tweaks to formatting; respond to KH questions

2009-02-10T04:41:53Z

tweaks to formatting; respond to KH questions

Kshawkin: filled in some gaps, raised two questions where my memory is different from PW and SB's

2009-01-29T16:28:56Z

filled in some gaps, raised two questions where my memory is different from PW and SB's

Piotr Banski: recat

2009-01-29T11:34:24Z

recat

Piotr Banski: + temporary category ("?")

2009-01-29T11:31:56Z

+ temporary category ("?")

Pwillett at 17:06, 28 January 2009

2009-01-28T17:06:13Z

Pwillett: New page: Attending: Syd Bauman (notes), Kevin Hawkins (chair), Chris Powell, Melanie Schlosser, Natasha Smith, Rich Wisneski, Perry Willett (notes) * header: ** see e-mail sent 2009-01-25 by KH fo...

2009-01-28T17:05:36Z

New page: Attending: Syd Bauman (notes), Kevin Hawkins (chair), Chris Powell, Melanie Schlosser, Natasha Smith, Rich Wisneski, Perry Willett (notes) * header: ** see e-mail sent 2009-01-25 by KH fo...

New page

Attending: Syd Bauman (notes), Kevin Hawkins (chair), Chris Powell, Melanie Schlosser, Natasha Smith, Rich Wisneski, Perry Willett (notes)

* header:
** see e-mail sent 2009-01-25 by KH for more details
** everyone should read and response (deadline?)
** The BPG recommends including series title in <sourceDesc> but doesn't mention any other series information. Should we recommend other info like ISSN or series editor?

* Levels
** Level 1: CP: thinks AB is fine.
** Level 2: RW: nothing to report
** Level 3: NS: needs a P5 example
*** discussion of LBs and genesis of Level 3; does anyone have a true example?
** Level 4: Linda Cantara no longer working on this, but Matt Gibson is
** Level 5: same is w/ L4
*** we need to add an example or two, although don't need to go into full detail

* Filenaming:
** agreed to point to or incorporate IUDLP guidelines
** agreed to 8-dot-3 health warning
** question on ".tei" vs ".xml" extension: agreed to use *.xml extension
** agreed that internal consistency is more important than following a particular set of restrictions [I'm going to suggest this become a general recommendation--SB]

* AB vs. P:
** in the pseudo-paras of Level 1 and Level 2 we agreed to AB

* Numbered/unnumbered divs: we agreed that there is no consensus on this issue, and we shouldn't make a recommendation for one over the other. Instead, we should:
** encourage consistency within texts and collections
** describe the reasoning behind choosing one
** describe process of converting one to the other (and provide tools?)
** recommend a place in the header to record the decision
** schema should enforce consistency within text

* PBs
** leave recommendation as is

* meeting at DLF Spring Forum in Raleigh NC (May 4-6)
** KH will check with Barrie about getting a meeting room

* People should remove comments from BPG if they feel the issue has been resolved. KH will oversee the process.

@@ Line 8: / Line 8: @@
 * Levels
-** Level 1: CP: thinks AB is fine.
+** Level 1: CP: thinks <tt>&lt;ab></tt> is fine.
 ** Level 2: RW: nothing to report
 ** Level 3: NS: needs a P5 example
-*** PW and CP said this case was envisioned for conversion from HTML at Virginia, so they might have an example.  CP said there's still a need for Level 3 as evidenced by the recent post to TEI-L from Martin Mueller asking about LBs.
+*** PW and CP said this case was envisioned for conversion from HTML at Virginia, so they might have an example.  CP said there's still a need for Level 3 as evidenced by the recent post to TEI-L from Martin Mueller asking about <tt>&lt;lb></tt>s.
 ** Level 4: Linda Cantara no longer working on this, but Matt Gibson is supposed to be.  Need to convert example to P5.  SB can do this.
 ** Level 5: same is w/ L4
@@ Line 18: / Line 18: @@
 * Filenaming:
 ** agreed to point to or incorporate IUDLP guidelines
-** agreed to 8-dot-3 health warning <span style="color: red">[KH: I thought we agreed to warning against using extensions longer than 3 but not on giving any recommendation on the filename before the dot aside from what's in IUDLP.]</span>
+** agreed to 8-dot-3 health warning <span style="color: red">[KH: I thought we agreed to warning against using extensions longer than 3 but not on giving any recommendation on the filename before the dot aside from what's in IUDLP.]</span> <span style="color: olive">[SB: My notes have exactly as listed here.]</span>
-** question on ".tei" vs ".xml" extension: agreed to use *.xml extension <span style="color: red">[KH: I thought we agreed to tell people to be internally consistent but otherwise to use what they want.]</span>
+** question on ".tei" vs ".xml" extension: agreed to use *.xml extension <span style="color: red">[KH: I thought we agreed to tell people to be internally consistent but otherwise to use what they want.]</span> <span style="color: olive">[SB: I dunno]</span>
 ** agreed that internal consistency is more important than following a particular set of restrictions [I'm going to suggest this become a general recommendation--SB]
-* AB vs. P:
+* <tt>&lt;ab></tt> vs. <tt>&lt;p></tt>:
-** in the pseudo-paras of Level 1 and Level 2 we agreed to AB
+** in the pseudo-paras of Level 1 and Level 2 we agreed to <tt>&lt;ab></tt>
 * Numbered/unnumbered divs: we agreed that there is no consensus on this issue, and we shouldn't make a recommendation for one over the other. Instead, we should:
@@ Line 29: / Line 29: @@
 ** describe the reasoning behind choosing one
 ** describe process of converting one to the other (and provide tools?)
-** recommend a place in the header to record the decision (probably encodingDecl)
+** recommend a place in the header to record the decision (probably <tt>&lt;encodingDecl</tt>)
-** schema should enforce consistency within whole file (front, body, and back elements)
+** schema should enforce consistency within whole file (<tt>&lt;front></tt>, <tt>&lt;body</tt>, and <tt>&lt;back</tt> elements)
-* PBs
+* <tt>&lt;pb></tt>s
-** leave recommendation as is (always within divs)
+** leave recommendation as is (always within <tt>&lt;div></tt>s)
 * meeting at DLF Spring Forum in Raleigh NC (May 4-6)

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:34, 29 January 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	[[category: ?]] ~~<!-- how about something more specific? to be included under "Meetings", see http://wiki.tei-c.org/index.php/Category:Meetings -->~~	+	[[category: Meetings]]
	Attending: Syd Bauman (notes), Kevin Hawkins (chair), Chris Powell, Melanie Schlosser, Natasha Smith, Rich Wisneski, Perry Willett (notes)		Attending: Syd Bauman (notes), Kevin Hawkins (chair), Chris Powell, Melanie Schlosser, Natasha Smith, Rich Wisneski, Perry Willett (notes)

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:31, 29 January 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	[[category: ?]] <!-- how about something more specific? to be included under "Meetings", see http://wiki.tei-c.org/index.php/Category:Meetings -->
	Attending: Syd Bauman (notes), Kevin Hawkins (chair), Chris Powell, Melanie Schlosser, Natasha Smith, Rich Wisneski, Perry Willett (notes)		Attending: Syd Bauman (notes), Kevin Hawkins (chair), Chris Powell, Melanie Schlosser, Natasha Smith, Rich Wisneski, Perry Willett (notes)

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 Attending: Syd Bauman (notes), Kevin Hawkins (chair), Chris Powell, Melanie Schlosser, Natasha Smith, Rich Wisneski, Perry Willett (notes)
-* header:
+* Header:
 ** see e-mail sent 2009-01-25 by KH for more details
 ** everyone should read and response (deadline?)
@@ Line 36: / Line 36: @@
 * meeting at DLF Spring Forum in Raleigh NC (May 4-6)
 ** KH will check with Barrie about getting a meeting room
 * People should remove comments from BPG if they feel the issue has been resolved. KH will oversee the process.