Review of Tite Scheme - Revision history

Kshawkin: Protected "Review of Tite Scheme": work has been completed [edit=sysop:move=sysop]

2011-11-14T16:39:18Z

Protected "Review of Tite Scheme": work has been completed [edit=sysop:move=sysop]

2011-11-13T20:47:56Z

Unprotected "Review of Tite Scheme": work has been completed

2009-03-30T13:40:37Z

Unprotected "Review of Tite Scheme": The review is no longer taking place. Contact Kshawkin with questions.

2009-03-30T13:39:58Z

noted that this work has been completed

2009-02-15T22:08:43Z

‎Comments Regarding Documentation

2009-02-15T22:06:18Z

‎comments on section 6: this is now dealt with above

2009-02-15T21:52:56Z

‎Comments Regarding the TEI Tite Encoding Language: include g element as suggested by Marcus Bingenheimer

2009-02-15T21:52:36Z

‎general comments: oops, will move to the above section

2009-02-15T21:50:40Z

‎general comments: inclusion g element as suggested by Marcus Bingenheimer

2009-01-25T22:28:57Z

added note from Marcus Bingenheimer at SIG meeting in London and a few things I just noticed

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:39, 30 March 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	[[Category:SIG:Libraries]]		[[Category:SIG:Libraries]]
		+
		+	<b>This work has been completed. See https://listserv.indiana.edu/cgi-bin/wa-iub.exe?A2=ind0903B&L=TEILIB-L&T=0&F=&S=&P=73 for more information.</b>
		+
		+	<hr />
		+
	[http://www.tei-c.org/wiki/index.php/SIG:Libraries TEI in Libraries: Home]		[http://www.tei-c.org/wiki/index.php/SIG:Libraries TEI in Libraries: Home]

@@ Line 69: / Line 69: @@
 * "gap" seems like a phrase-level element, so shouldn't it be in section 6 instead?
 ===comments on appendix b===
 * definition of "gap" contains cross-reference with "??" in it.

@@ Line 70: / Line 70: @@
 * "gap" seems like a phrase-level element, so shouldn't it be in section 6 instead?
 ===comments on appendix b===
 * definition of "gap" contains cross-reference with "??" in it.

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:52, 15 February 2009
Line 11:		Line 11:

	This section is for comments about the encoding language itself, preferably with use cases to support them. E.g. “At Blort University we would want you to add a foo= attribute to the <blort> element because we often categorize our texts by both their fooness and blortness.”.		This section is for comments about the encoding language itself, preferably with use cases to support them. E.g. “At Blort University we would want you to add a foo= attribute to the <blort> element because we often categorize our texts by both their fooness and blortness.”.
		+
		+	* Need to include <tt>g</tt> element in order for Tite to be used in Far East projects. (This was suggested by Marcus Bingenheimer at the SIG meeting in London.)

	== Comments Regarding Documentation ==		== Comments Regarding Documentation ==

@@ Line 25: / Line 25: @@
 * Incorporate outside documentation (for example, Virginia's DLPS documentation) into this document so it can stand alone.  (This was suggested by Andrew Rouner at the SIG meeting in London.) ([[User:Kshawkin|Kshawkin]])
 * House editorial style for examples in the TEI Guidelines use XML comments, not square brackets, to delimit areas of element content that are excluded for readability of the example. Using the same approach in the Tite will make it more consistent with, and thus more readable alongside, the TEI Guidelines.
 ===comments on section 1===

← Older revision	Revision as of 16:39, 14 November 2011
(No difference)

← Older revision	Revision as of 20:47, 13 November 2011
(No difference)

← Older revision	Revision as of 13:40, 30 March 2009
(No difference)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:28, 25 January 2009
Line 63:		Line 63:
	===comments on section 3.5===		===comments on section 3.5===
	* Typo in the documentation: <titePart> instead of <titlePart>([[User:Mholmes\|Mholmes]])		* Typo in the documentation: <titePart> instead of <titlePart>([[User:Mholmes\|Mholmes]])
		+
		+	===comments on section 5.6===
		+
		+	* "gap" seems like a phrase-level element, so shouldn't it be in section 6 instead?
		+
		+	===comments on section 6===
		+
		+	* As suggested by Marcus Bingenheimer: add "g" as an allowed phrase-level element . If this element is not allowed, there's no hope that Tite will be adopted by users in the Far East.
		+
		+	===comments on appendix b===
		+
		+	* definition of "gap" contains cross-reference with "??" in it.