SIGMS Minutes 20111014 - Revision history

Bwbohl: /* Participants */

2011-10-20T07:36:33Z

‎Participants

2011-10-14T12:19:08Z

2011-10-14T08:30:58Z

2011-10-14T08:28:53Z

2011-10-14T08:25:25Z

2011-10-14T08:24:45Z

2011-10-14T08:19:50Z

2011-10-14T08:17:07Z

2011-10-14T08:16:18Z

2011-10-14T08:07:16Z

@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
 * Oliver Gasperlin (OG)
 * Gregor Middell (GM) – minutes
 * ''(many more, please add your name here)''

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:19, 14 October 2011
Line 37:		Line 37:
	* MR: problem of SIG's scope, lots of interest in manuscripts, but how to derive concrete tasks from that, maybe should come up with a new definition of what the SIG should do		* MR: problem of SIG's scope, lots of interest in manuscripts, but how to derive concrete tasks from that, maybe should come up with a new definition of what the SIG should do
	* OG: supports idea of asking for micropapers before SIG meetings		* OG: supports idea of asking for micropapers before SIG meetings
		+
		+	[[Category:SIG\|MSS]]
		+	[[Category:SIG:Manuscripts]]

@@ Line 8: / Line 8: @@
 * Joachim Veit (JV)
 * Malte Rehbein (MR)
 * Gregor Middell (GM) – minutes
-...
+* ''(many more, please add your name here)''
 == Introduction (EP) ==
@@ Line 35: / Line 36: @@
 * idea about further modularizing the TEI, e.g. via use of different namespaces, address different use cases this way
 * MR: problem of SIG's scope, lots of interest in manuscripts, but how to derive concrete tasks from that, maybe should come up with a new definition of what the SIG should do

@@ Line 7: / Line 7: @@
 * Ron Van den Branden (RB)
 * Joachim Veit (JV)
 * Gregor Middell (GM) – minutes
 ...
@@ Line 33: / Line 34: @@
 * EP: SIG "Text-Bearing Objects" might be a good place to address this
 * idea about further modularizing the TEI, e.g. via use of different namespaces, address different use cases this way

@@ Line 32: / Line 32: @@
 * JV: structure of text is sometimes hard to describe with existing elements, not a problem of manuscripts alone, maybe some conceptual overlap with manuscript description
 * EP: SIG "Text-Bearing Objects" might be a good place to address this
-* idea about further modularizing the TEI, e.g. via use of different namespaces
+* idea about further modularizing the TEI, e.g. via use of different namespaces, address different use cases this way

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:24, 14 October 2011
Line 32:		Line 32:
	* JV: structure of text is sometimes hard to describe with existing elements, not a problem of manuscripts alone, maybe some conceptual overlap with manuscript description		* JV: structure of text is sometimes hard to describe with existing elements, not a problem of manuscripts alone, maybe some conceptual overlap with manuscript description
	* EP: SIG "Text-Bearing Objects" might be a good place to address this		* EP: SIG "Text-Bearing Objects" might be a good place to address this
		+	* idea about further modularizing the TEI, e.g. via use of different namespaces

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:19, 14 October 2011
Line 31:		Line 31:
	* TS: refering to ENRICH again, there are existing resources and documentation for manuscript description, including conversion scenarios (TEI, EAD, ...)		* TS: refering to ENRICH again, there are existing resources and documentation for manuscript description, including conversion scenarios (TEI, EAD, ...)
	* JV: structure of text is sometimes hard to describe with existing elements, not a problem of manuscripts alone, maybe some conceptual overlap with manuscript description		* JV: structure of text is sometimes hard to describe with existing elements, not a problem of manuscripts alone, maybe some conceptual overlap with manuscript description
		+	* EP: SIG "Text-Bearing Objects" might be a good place to address this

@@ Line 30: / Line 30: @@
 * RB: we could extend [http://tbe.kantl.be/TBE/ TEI by Example] with manuscript-related resources
 * TS: refering to ENRICH again, there are existing resources and documentation for manuscript description, including conversion scenarios (TEI, EAD, ...)
-* JV: structure of text is sometimes hard to describe with existing elements, maybe some conceptual overlap with manuscript description
+* JV: structure of text is sometimes hard to describe with existing elements, not a problem of manuscripts alone, maybe some conceptual overlap with manuscript description

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:07, 14 October 2011
Line 28:		Line 28:
	* EP: SIG can act as a proxy though		* EP: SIG can act as a proxy though
	* RB: we could extend [http://tbe.kantl.be/TBE/ TEI by Example] with manuscript-related resources		* RB: we could extend [http://tbe.kantl.be/TBE/ TEI by Example] with manuscript-related resources
		+	* TS: refering to ENRICH again, there are existing resources and documentation for manuscript description, including conversion scenarios (TEI, EAD, ...)