Talk:Main Page - Revision history

James: /* Registration */ new section

2023-05-08T18:42:24Z

‎Registration: new section

Piotr Banski: /* Banned strings */

2014-04-08T13:17:57Z

‎Banned strings

Thierry CHANIER: /* Contact info */

2014-04-08T13:06:14Z

‎Contact info

Thierry CHANIER: /* Contact info */

2014-04-08T13:05:38Z

‎Contact info

Kshawkin: /* More links on home page */ done

2012-08-04T13:58:27Z

‎More links on home page: done

John P. McCaskey: /* More links on home page */ new section

2012-08-02T12:08:10Z

‎More links on home page: new section

Piotr Banski: Reverted edits by LessMomey (Talk); changed back to last version by Kshawkin

2011-09-22T07:34:20Z

Reverted edits by LessMomey (Talk); changed back to last version by Kshawkin

LessMomey at 06:37, 22 September 2011

2011-09-22T06:37:49Z

Kshawkin: Undo revision 9362 by Apple0619 (Talk)

2011-05-03T16:07:42Z

Undo revision 9362 by Apple0619 (Talk)

Apple0619 at 02:32, 3 May 2011

2011-05-03T02:32:21Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:42, 8 May 2023
Line 13:		Line 13:

	: Done ([[User:Kshawkin\|Kshawkin]] 09:58, 4 August 2012 (EDT))		: Done ([[User:Kshawkin\|Kshawkin]] 09:58, 4 August 2012 (EDT))
		+
		+	== Registration ==
		+
		+	There is a link to 'login or register' which just allows one to login not register. I believe this is controlled in the settings somewhere and the registrations are turned off. What we should do is turn it back on but then require any new registrations to be approved.
		+
		+	-[[User:James\|JamesC]] ([[User talk:James\|talk]])

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-== Contact info ==
+== Banned strings ==
 It says certain words have been banned because they're commonly used in spam but to "let us know" if you want to use any of them.  Who should we contact?
 :Hi Kevin -- I know the pain, I once wanted to use the word 'spec<span>ia</span>list' and couldn't save (note the '<span>ci</span>alis' substring). Note also that I circumvented the filter (see the source). Which is not exactly a strong argument against using the filter, but it is ''some'' kind of argument for sure. So until you reach James and perhaps James reaches Chris (not sure if he needs to in this respect) in order to whitelist the relevant words, this may be the way to proceed. (Hmm, should I keep this secret from "the public"? But our public is not really prone to that sort of mischief, so I don't think I'm risking much ;-)) [[User:Piotr Banski|Piotr]] 17:52, 7 November 2010 (EST)
-: How can we do in order to change filters behaviour? I tried to give examples in the CMC SIG of participants' description. I cannot even use the TEI element corresponding to gender, which TEI decided to give another name I cannot pronounced here (chut :-) ) because the filter removed all my examples. How strange! Can it be adjusted? Thanks in advance.--[[User:Thierry CHANIER|Thierry CHANIER]] 15:06, 8 April 2014 (CEST)
+:: How can we do in order to change filters behaviour? I tried to give examples in the CMC SIG of participants' description. I cannot even use the TEI element corresponding to gender, which TEI decided to give another name I cannot pronounced here (chut :-) ) because the filter removed all my examples. How strange! Can it be adjusted? Thanks in advance.--[[User:Thierry CHANIER|Thierry CHANIER]] 15:06, 8 April 2014 (CEST)
 == More links on home page ==

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 It says certain words have been banned because they're commonly used in spam but to "let us know" if you want to use any of them.  Who should we contact?
 :Hi Kevin -- I know the pain, I once wanted to use the word 'spec<span>ia</span>list' and couldn't save (note the '<span>ci</span>alis' substring). Note also that I circumvented the filter (see the source). Which is not exactly a strong argument against using the filter, but it is ''some'' kind of argument for sure. So until you reach James and perhaps James reaches Chris (not sure if he needs to in this respect) in order to whitelist the relevant words, this may be the way to proceed. (Hmm, should I keep this secret from "the public"? But our public is not really prone to that sort of mischief, so I don't think I'm risking much ;-)) [[User:Piotr Banski|Piotr]] 17:52, 7 November 2010 (EST)
-: How can we do in order to change filters behaviour? I tried to give examples in the CMC SIG of participants' description. I cannot even use the TEI element corresponding to gender, which TEI decided to give another name I cannot pronounced here (chut :-) ) because the filter removed all my examples. How strange! Can it be adjusted? Thanks in advance.
+: How can we do in order to change filters behaviour? I tried to give examples in the CMC SIG of participants' description. I cannot even use the TEI element corresponding to gender, which TEI decided to give another name I cannot pronounced here (chut :-) ) because the filter removed all my examples. How strange! Can it be adjusted? Thanks in advance.--[[User:Thierry CHANIER|Thierry CHANIER]] 15:06, 8 April 2014 (CEST)
 == More links on home page ==

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 It says certain words have been banned because they're commonly used in spam but to "let us know" if you want to use any of them.  Who should we contact?
 :Hi Kevin -- I know the pain, I once wanted to use the word 'spec<span>ia</span>list' and couldn't save (note the '<span>ci</span>alis' substring). Note also that I circumvented the filter (see the source). Which is not exactly a strong argument against using the filter, but it is ''some'' kind of argument for sure. So until you reach James and perhaps James reaches Chris (not sure if he needs to in this respect) in order to whitelist the relevant words, this may be the way to proceed. (Hmm, should I keep this secret from "the public"? But our public is not really prone to that sort of mischief, so I don't think I'm risking much ;-)) [[User:Piotr Banski|Piotr]] 17:52, 7 November 2010 (EST)
 == More links on home page ==

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:58, 4 August 2012
Line 9:		Line 9:

	There is much more in the Wiki than I realized before finding these two pages.		There is much more in the Wiki than I realized before finding these two pages.
		+
		+	: Done ([[User:Kshawkin\|Kshawkin]] 09:58, 4 August 2012 (EDT))

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:08, 2 August 2012
Line 3:		Line 3:
	It says certain words have been banned because they're commonly used in spam but to "let us know" if you want to use any of them. Who should we contact?		It says certain words have been banned because they're commonly used in spam but to "let us know" if you want to use any of them. Who should we contact?
	:Hi Kevin -- I know the pain, I once wanted to use the word 'spec<span>ia</span>list' and couldn't save (note the '<span>ci</span>alis' substring). Note also that I circumvented the filter (see the source). Which is not exactly a strong argument against using the filter, but it is ''some'' kind of argument for sure. So until you reach James and perhaps James reaches Chris (not sure if he needs to in this respect) in order to whitelist the relevant words, this may be the way to proceed. (Hmm, should I keep this secret from "the public"? But our public is not really prone to that sort of mischief, so I don't think I'm risking much ;-)) [[User:Piotr Banski\|Piotr]] 17:52, 7 November 2010 (EST)		:Hi Kevin -- I know the pain, I once wanted to use the word 'spec<span>ia</span>list' and couldn't save (note the '<span>ci</span>alis' substring). Note also that I circumvented the filter (see the source). Which is not exactly a strong argument against using the filter, but it is ''some'' kind of argument for sure. So until you reach James and perhaps James reaches Chris (not sure if he needs to in this respect) in order to whitelist the relevant words, this may be the way to proceed. (Hmm, should I keep this secret from "the public"? But our public is not really prone to that sort of mischief, so I don't think I'm risking much ;-)) [[User:Piotr Banski\|Piotr]] 17:52, 7 November 2010 (EST)
		+
		+	== More links on home page ==
		+
		+	I suggest adding links to http://wiki.tei-c.org/index.php/Special:AllPages and http://wiki.tei-c.org/index.php/Special:Categories to the Wiki home page.
		+
		+	There is much more in the Wiki than I realized before finding these two pages.

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:34, 22 September 2011
Line 3:		Line 3:
	It says certain words have been banned because they're commonly used in spam but to "let us know" if you want to use any of them. Who should we contact?		It says certain words have been banned because they're commonly used in spam but to "let us know" if you want to use any of them. Who should we contact?
	:Hi Kevin -- I know the pain, I once wanted to use the word 'spec<span>ia</span>list' and couldn't save (note the '<span>ci</span>alis' substring). Note also that I circumvented the filter (see the source). Which is not exactly a strong argument against using the filter, but it is ''some'' kind of argument for sure. So until you reach James and perhaps James reaches Chris (not sure if he needs to in this respect) in order to whitelist the relevant words, this may be the way to proceed. (Hmm, should I keep this secret from "the public"? But our public is not really prone to that sort of mischief, so I don't think I'm risking much ;-)) [[User:Piotr Banski\|Piotr]] 17:52, 7 November 2010 (EST)		:Hi Kevin -- I know the pain, I once wanted to use the word 'spec<span>ia</span>list' and couldn't save (note the '<span>ci</span>alis' substring). Note also that I circumvented the filter (see the source). Which is not exactly a strong argument against using the filter, but it is ''some'' kind of argument for sure. So until you reach James and perhaps James reaches Chris (not sure if he needs to in this respect) in order to whitelist the relevant words, this may be the way to proceed. (Hmm, should I keep this secret from "the public"? But our public is not really prone to that sort of mischief, so I don't think I'm risking much ;-)) [[User:Piotr Banski\|Piotr]] 17:52, 7 November 2010 (EST)
−	They aswell appear in accepted and baby ranges but compared to added artist fashionable http://www.noblebagsale.net/ ,it's still bigger than the standard. From accomplished few years' ladies affairs http://www.noblebagsale.net/gucci-sneakers-high-line_7_1.htm ,they are tote accoutrements that accept a appropriate appearance altered from the archetypal ellipsoidal anatomy the majority http://www.noblebagsale.net/gucci-sneakers-low-line_8_1.htm are accustomed by. The majority http://www.noblebagsale.net/gucci-sneakers-middle-line_9_1.htm that are fabricated of beige-ebony actual appear with white or black, amber or blue. http://www.noblebagsale.net/gucci-boots_1_1.htm are embodied by bifold straps, breeze closure. Aswell apprehension to the detail work, disposable chain the G charm, studs and central zips pocket.

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:37, 22 September 2011
Line 3:		Line 3:
	It says certain words have been banned because they're commonly used in spam but to "let us know" if you want to use any of them. Who should we contact?		It says certain words have been banned because they're commonly used in spam but to "let us know" if you want to use any of them. Who should we contact?
	:Hi Kevin -- I know the pain, I once wanted to use the word 'spec<span>ia</span>list' and couldn't save (note the '<span>ci</span>alis' substring). Note also that I circumvented the filter (see the source). Which is not exactly a strong argument against using the filter, but it is ''some'' kind of argument for sure. So until you reach James and perhaps James reaches Chris (not sure if he needs to in this respect) in order to whitelist the relevant words, this may be the way to proceed. (Hmm, should I keep this secret from "the public"? But our public is not really prone to that sort of mischief, so I don't think I'm risking much ;-)) [[User:Piotr Banski\|Piotr]] 17:52, 7 November 2010 (EST)		:Hi Kevin -- I know the pain, I once wanted to use the word 'spec<span>ia</span>list' and couldn't save (note the '<span>ci</span>alis' substring). Note also that I circumvented the filter (see the source). Which is not exactly a strong argument against using the filter, but it is ''some'' kind of argument for sure. So until you reach James and perhaps James reaches Chris (not sure if he needs to in this respect) in order to whitelist the relevant words, this may be the way to proceed. (Hmm, should I keep this secret from "the public"? But our public is not really prone to that sort of mischief, so I don't think I'm risking much ;-)) [[User:Piotr Banski\|Piotr]] 17:52, 7 November 2010 (EST)
		+	They aswell appear in accepted and baby ranges but compared to added artist fashionable http://www.noblebagsale.net/ ,it's still bigger than the standard. From accomplished few years' ladies affairs http://www.noblebagsale.net/gucci-sneakers-high-line_7_1.htm ,they are tote accoutrements that accept a appropriate appearance altered from the archetypal ellipsoidal anatomy the majority http://www.noblebagsale.net/gucci-sneakers-low-line_8_1.htm are accustomed by. The majority http://www.noblebagsale.net/gucci-sneakers-middle-line_9_1.htm that are fabricated of beige-ebony actual appear with white or black, amber or blue. http://www.noblebagsale.net/gucci-boots_1_1.htm are embodied by bifold straps, breeze closure. Aswell apprehension to the detail work, disposable chain the G charm, studs and central zips pocket.

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:07, 3 May 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	When it http://www.westwoodsalg.com/vivienne-westwood-oreringe.html arrives to affordable chic ed hardy Hardy t shirts, there are really a few components that one could say about them. They are extremely specific clothing also it doesn't subject if you actually certainly are http://www.westwoodsalg.com/egte-vivienne-westwood.html	+	== Contact info ==
−	a female or perhaps a man, available for you will undoubtedly arrive at uncover people clothing that will suit you perfectly. In regards in the direction of the shirts for women, they just visual element extraordinary plus in addition they can be http://www.westwoodsalg.com/vivienne-westwood-danmark.html found at a specific price.

−	~~These shirts are best for just about~~ any ~~spring evening or an earlier autumn evening and on best belonging in the direction~~ of ~~http~~://~~www~~.~~westwoodsalg~~.~~com/vivienne-westwood-halskaeder~~.~~html~~ the ~~actuality that you simply~~ may ~~custom made purchase them~~, ~~they are designed~~ from ~~extremely great offers that are resistant~~ to ~~warm consuming water (if you will arrive at rinse them with~~ that ~~by accident~~) ~~and also http~~:~~//www.westwoodsalg.com/vivienne-westwood-charms.html to tearing.~~	+	It says certain words have been banned because they're commonly used in spam but to "let us know" if you want to use any of them. Who should we contact?
		+	:Hi Kevin -- I know the pain, I once wanted to use the word 'spec<span>ia</span>list' and couldn't save (note the '<span>ci</span>alis' substring). Note also that I circumvented the filter (see the source). Which is not exactly a strong argument against using the filter, but it is ''some'' kind of argument for sure. So until you reach James and perhaps James reaches Chris (not sure if he needs to in this respect) in order to whitelist the relevant words, this may be the way to proceed. (Hmm, should I keep this secret from "the public"? But our public is not really prone to that sort of mischief, so I don't think I'm risking much ;-)) [[User:Piotr Banski\|Piotr]] 17:52, 7 November 2010 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:32, 3 May 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	~~== Contact info ==~~	+	When it http://www.westwoodsalg.com/vivienne-westwood-oreringe.html arrives to affordable chic ed hardy Hardy t shirts, there are really a few components that one could say about them. They are extremely specific clothing also it doesn't subject if you actually certainly are http://www.westwoodsalg.com/egte-vivienne-westwood.html
		+	a female or perhaps a man, available for you will undoubtedly arrive at uncover people clothing that will suit you perfectly. In regards in the direction of the shirts for women, they just visual element extraordinary plus in addition they can be http://www.westwoodsalg.com/vivienne-westwood-danmark.html found at a specific price.

−	~~It says certain words have been banned because they're commonly used~~ in ~~spam but to "let us know" if you want to use any~~ of ~~them. Who should we contact?~~	+	These shirts are best for just about any spring evening or an earlier autumn evening and on best belonging in the direction of http://www.westwoodsalg.com/vivienne-westwood-halskaeder.html the actuality that you simply may custom made purchase them, they are designed from extremely great offers that are resistant to warm consuming water (if you will arrive at rinse them with that by accident) and also http://www.westwoodsalg.com/vivienne-westwood-charms.html to tearing.
−	:~~Hi Kevin -- I know the pain, I once wanted to use the word 'spec<span>ia<~~/~~span>list' and couldn't save (note the '<span>ci<~~/~~span>alis' substring)~~. ~~Note also that I circumvented the filter (see the source)~~. ~~Which is not exactly a strong argument against using~~ the ~~filter, but it is ''some'' kind of argument for sure. So until~~ you ~~reach James and perhaps James reaches Chris (not sure if he needs to in this respect) in order to whitelist the relevant words, this~~ may ~~be the way to proceed. (Hmm~~, ~~should I keep this secret~~ from ~~"the public"? But our public is not really prone~~ to that ~~sort of mischief, so I don't think I'm risking much ;-~~)~~) [[User~~:~~Piotr Banski\|Piotr]] 17:52, 7 November 2010 (EST)~~