Talk:Main Page - Revision history

James: /* Registration */ new section

2023-05-08T18:42:24Z

Registration: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:42, 8 May 2023
Line 13:		Line 13:

	: Done ([[User:Kshawkin\|Kshawkin]] 09:58, 4 August 2012 (EDT))		: Done ([[User:Kshawkin\|Kshawkin]] 09:58, 4 August 2012 (EDT))

			== Registration ==

			There is a link to 'login or register' which just allows one to login not register. I believe this is controlled in the settings somewhere and the registrations are turned off. What we should do is turn it back on but then require any new registrations to be approved.

			-[[User:James\|JamesC]] ([[User talk:James\|talk]])

Piotr Banski: /* Banned strings */

2014-04-08T13:17:57Z

Banned strings

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:17, 8 April 2014
Line 1:		Line 1:
	== ~~Contact info~~ ==		== Banned strings ==

	It says certain words have been banned because they're commonly used in spam but to "let us know" if you want to use any of them. Who should we contact?		It says certain words have been banned because they're commonly used in spam but to "let us know" if you want to use any of them. Who should we contact?
	:Hi Kevin -- I know the pain, I once wanted to use the word 'spec<span>ia</span>list' and couldn't save (note the '<span>ci</span>alis' substring). Note also that I circumvented the filter (see the source). Which is not exactly a strong argument against using the filter, but it is ''some'' kind of argument for sure. So until you reach James and perhaps James reaches Chris (not sure if he needs to in this respect) in order to whitelist the relevant words, this may be the way to proceed. (Hmm, should I keep this secret from "the public"? But our public is not really prone to that sort of mischief, so I don't think I'm risking much ;-)) [[User:Piotr Banski\|Piotr]] 17:52, 7 November 2010 (EST)		:Hi Kevin -- I know the pain, I once wanted to use the word 'spec<span>ia</span>list' and couldn't save (note the '<span>ci</span>alis' substring). Note also that I circumvented the filter (see the source). Which is not exactly a strong argument against using the filter, but it is ''some'' kind of argument for sure. So until you reach James and perhaps James reaches Chris (not sure if he needs to in this respect) in order to whitelist the relevant words, this may be the way to proceed. (Hmm, should I keep this secret from "the public"? But our public is not really prone to that sort of mischief, so I don't think I'm risking much ;-)) [[User:Piotr Banski\|Piotr]] 17:52, 7 November 2010 (EST)
	: How can we do in order to change filters behaviour? I tried to give examples in the CMC SIG of participants' description. I cannot even use the TEI element corresponding to gender, which TEI decided to give another name I cannot pronounced here (chut :-) ) because the filter removed all my examples. How strange! Can it be adjusted? Thanks in advance.--[[User:Thierry CHANIER\|Thierry CHANIER]] 15:06, 8 April 2014 (CEST)		:: How can we do in order to change filters behaviour? I tried to give examples in the CMC SIG of participants' description. I cannot even use the TEI element corresponding to gender, which TEI decided to give another name I cannot pronounced here (chut :-) ) because the filter removed all my examples. How strange! Can it be adjusted? Thanks in advance.--[[User:Thierry CHANIER\|Thierry CHANIER]] 15:06, 8 April 2014 (CEST)
			::: Dear Thierry, please see the source of this section for one way to avoid the filter. Basically, you want to disrupt the contiguity of the "offending" strings. Best, [[User:Piotr Banski\|Piotr]] 15:17, 8 April 2014 (CEST)

	== More links on home page ==		== More links on home page ==

Thierry CHANIER: /* Contact info */

2014-04-08T13:06:14Z

Contact info

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:06, 8 April 2014
Line 3:		Line 3:
	It says certain words have been banned because they're commonly used in spam but to "let us know" if you want to use any of them. Who should we contact?		It says certain words have been banned because they're commonly used in spam but to "let us know" if you want to use any of them. Who should we contact?
	:Hi Kevin -- I know the pain, I once wanted to use the word 'spec<span>ia</span>list' and couldn't save (note the '<span>ci</span>alis' substring). Note also that I circumvented the filter (see the source). Which is not exactly a strong argument against using the filter, but it is ''some'' kind of argument for sure. So until you reach James and perhaps James reaches Chris (not sure if he needs to in this respect) in order to whitelist the relevant words, this may be the way to proceed. (Hmm, should I keep this secret from "the public"? But our public is not really prone to that sort of mischief, so I don't think I'm risking much ;-)) [[User:Piotr Banski\|Piotr]] 17:52, 7 November 2010 (EST)		:Hi Kevin -- I know the pain, I once wanted to use the word 'spec<span>ia</span>list' and couldn't save (note the '<span>ci</span>alis' substring). Note also that I circumvented the filter (see the source). Which is not exactly a strong argument against using the filter, but it is ''some'' kind of argument for sure. So until you reach James and perhaps James reaches Chris (not sure if he needs to in this respect) in order to whitelist the relevant words, this may be the way to proceed. (Hmm, should I keep this secret from "the public"? But our public is not really prone to that sort of mischief, so I don't think I'm risking much ;-)) [[User:Piotr Banski\|Piotr]] 17:52, 7 November 2010 (EST)
	: How can we do in order to change filters behaviour? I tried to give examples in the CMC SIG of participants' description. I cannot even use the TEI element corresponding to gender, which TEI decided to give another name I cannot pronounced here (chut :-) ) because the filter removed all my examples. How strange! Can it be adjusted? Thanks in advance.		: How can we do in order to change filters behaviour? I tried to give examples in the CMC SIG of participants' description. I cannot even use the TEI element corresponding to gender, which TEI decided to give another name I cannot pronounced here (chut :-) ) because the filter removed all my examples. How strange! Can it be adjusted? Thanks in advance.--[[User:Thierry CHANIER\|Thierry CHANIER]] 15:06, 8 April 2014 (CEST)

	== More links on home page ==		== More links on home page ==

Thierry CHANIER: /* Contact info */

2014-04-08T13:05:38Z

Contact info

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:05, 8 April 2014
Line 3:		Line 3:
	It says certain words have been banned because they're commonly used in spam but to "let us know" if you want to use any of them. Who should we contact?		It says certain words have been banned because they're commonly used in spam but to "let us know" if you want to use any of them. Who should we contact?
	:Hi Kevin -- I know the pain, I once wanted to use the word 'spec<span>ia</span>list' and couldn't save (note the '<span>ci</span>alis' substring). Note also that I circumvented the filter (see the source). Which is not exactly a strong argument against using the filter, but it is ''some'' kind of argument for sure. So until you reach James and perhaps James reaches Chris (not sure if he needs to in this respect) in order to whitelist the relevant words, this may be the way to proceed. (Hmm, should I keep this secret from "the public"? But our public is not really prone to that sort of mischief, so I don't think I'm risking much ;-)) [[User:Piotr Banski\|Piotr]] 17:52, 7 November 2010 (EST)		:Hi Kevin -- I know the pain, I once wanted to use the word 'spec<span>ia</span>list' and couldn't save (note the '<span>ci</span>alis' substring). Note also that I circumvented the filter (see the source). Which is not exactly a strong argument against using the filter, but it is ''some'' kind of argument for sure. So until you reach James and perhaps James reaches Chris (not sure if he needs to in this respect) in order to whitelist the relevant words, this may be the way to proceed. (Hmm, should I keep this secret from "the public"? But our public is not really prone to that sort of mischief, so I don't think I'm risking much ;-)) [[User:Piotr Banski\|Piotr]] 17:52, 7 November 2010 (EST)
			: How can we do in order to change filters behaviour? I tried to give examples in the CMC SIG of participants' description. I cannot even use the TEI element corresponding to gender, which TEI decided to give another name I cannot pronounced here (chut :-) ) because the filter removed all my examples. How strange! Can it be adjusted? Thanks in advance.

	== More links on home page ==		== More links on home page ==

Kshawkin: /* More links on home page */ done

2012-08-04T13:58:27Z

John P. McCaskey: /* More links on home page */ new section

2012-08-02T12:08:10Z

Piotr Banski: Reverted edits by LessMomey (Talk); changed back to last version by Kshawkin

2011-09-22T07:34:20Z

Reverted edits by LessMomey (Talk); changed back to last version by Kshawkin

New page

== Contact info ==

It says certain words have been banned because they're commonly used in spam but to "let us know" if you want to use any of them. Who should we contact?
:Hi Kevin -- I know the pain, I once wanted to use the word 'spec<span>ia</span>list' and couldn't save (note the '<span>ci</span>alis' substring). Note also that I circumvented the filter (see the source). Which is not exactly a strong argument against using the filter, but it is ''some'' kind of argument for sure. So until you reach James and perhaps James reaches Chris (not sure if he needs to in this respect) in order to whitelist the relevant words, this may be the way to proceed. (Hmm, should I keep this secret from "the public"? But our public is not really prone to that sort of mischief, so I don't think I'm risking much ;-)) [[User:Piotr Banski|Piotr]] 17:52, 7 November 2010 (EST)

Kshawkin: Undo revision 9362 by Apple0619 (Talk)

2011-05-03T16:07:42Z

Undo revision 9362 by Apple0619 (Talk)

New page

Piotr Banski: /* Contact info */ a reply, of sorts

2010-11-07T22:52:59Z

Contact info: a reply, of sorts

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:52, 7 November 2010
Line 2:		Line 2:

	It says certain words have been banned because they're commonly used in spam but to "let us know" if you want to use any of them. Who should we contact?		It says certain words have been banned because they're commonly used in spam but to "let us know" if you want to use any of them. Who should we contact?
			:Hi Kevin -- I know the pain, I once wanted to use the word 'spec<span>ia</span>list' and couldn't save (note the '<span>ci</span>alis' substring). Note also that I circumvented the filter (see the source). Which is not exactly a strong argument against using the filter, but it is ''some'' kind of argument for sure. So until you reach James and perhaps James reaches Chris (not sure if he needs to in this respect) in order to whitelist the relevant words, this may be the way to proceed. (Hmm, should I keep this secret from "the public"? But our public is not really prone to that sort of mischief, so I don't think I'm risking much ;-)) [[User:Piotr Banski\|Piotr]] 17:52, 7 November 2010 (EST)

Kshawkin: who to contact in order to use banned words

2010-11-07T22:32:43Z

who to contact in order to use banned words

New page

== Contact info ==

It says certain words have been banned because they're commonly used in spam but to "let us know" if you want to use any of them. Who should we contact?

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:58, 4 August 2012
Line 9:		Line 9:

	There is much more in the Wiki than I realized before finding these two pages.		There is much more in the Wiki than I realized before finding these two pages.

			: Done ([[User:Kshawkin\|Kshawkin]] 09:58, 4 August 2012 (EDT))

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:08, 2 August 2012
Line 3:		Line 3:
	It says certain words have been banned because they're commonly used in spam but to "let us know" if you want to use any of them. Who should we contact?		It says certain words have been banned because they're commonly used in spam but to "let us know" if you want to use any of them. Who should we contact?
	:Hi Kevin -- I know the pain, I once wanted to use the word 'spec<span>ia</span>list' and couldn't save (note the '<span>ci</span>alis' substring). Note also that I circumvented the filter (see the source). Which is not exactly a strong argument against using the filter, but it is ''some'' kind of argument for sure. So until you reach James and perhaps James reaches Chris (not sure if he needs to in this respect) in order to whitelist the relevant words, this may be the way to proceed. (Hmm, should I keep this secret from "the public"? But our public is not really prone to that sort of mischief, so I don't think I'm risking much ;-)) [[User:Piotr Banski\|Piotr]] 17:52, 7 November 2010 (EST)		:Hi Kevin -- I know the pain, I once wanted to use the word 'spec<span>ia</span>list' and couldn't save (note the '<span>ci</span>alis' substring). Note also that I circumvented the filter (see the source). Which is not exactly a strong argument against using the filter, but it is ''some'' kind of argument for sure. So until you reach James and perhaps James reaches Chris (not sure if he needs to in this respect) in order to whitelist the relevant words, this may be the way to proceed. (Hmm, should I keep this secret from "the public"? But our public is not really prone to that sort of mischief, so I don't think I'm risking much ;-)) [[User:Piotr Banski\|Piotr]] 17:52, 7 November 2010 (EST)

			== More links on home page ==

			I suggest adding links to http://wiki.tei-c.org/index.php/Special:AllPages and http://wiki.tei-c.org/index.php/Special:Categories to the Wiki home page.

			There is much more in the Wiki than I realized before finding these two pages.