Talk:TEI-Council-FAQ - Revision history

Kshawkin: /* Elections */ resolved

2013-11-02T23:29:25Z

‎Elections: resolved

Syd: /* Elections */

2013-11-02T14:57:43Z

‎Elections

Syd at 14:57, 2 November 2013

2013-11-02T14:57:23Z

Kshawkin: /* Durand Conundrum */ suggested revision

2012-03-18T19:04:48Z

‎Durand Conundrum: suggested revision

Kshawkin: New page: == Durand Conundrum == I'm told there's something called the "Durand Conundrum". Though it hasn't yet come up in Council discussions, it would be good to add a note on the TEI-Council-FA...

2010-04-15T08:43:10Z

New page: == Durand Conundrum == I'm told there's something called the "Durand Conundrum". Though it hasn't yet come up in Council discussions, it would be good to add a note on the TEI-Council-FA...

New page

== Durand Conundrum ==

I'm told there's something called the "Durand Conundrum". Though it hasn't yet come up in Council discussions, it would be good to add a note on the TEI-Council-FAQ because I don't think there's any more appropriate place to put this.

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:29, 2 November 2013
Line 2:		Line 2:

	Shouldn't "This should be a private election with no one able to determine who has voted for who" end with "whom"?		Shouldn't "This should be a private election with no one able to determine who has voted for who" end with "whom"?
		+
		+	: While "whom" is basically unused in casual conversation in American English, some people like to use it in writing. I understand that it's more archaic in British English though still encountered. Anyway, for the pedants, I've updated it. ([[User:Kshawkin\|Kshawkin]] 19:29, 2 November 2013 (EDT))

	== Durand Conundrum ==		== Durand Conundrum ==

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 == Elections ==
   Shouldn't "This should be a private election with no one able to determine who has voted for who" end with "whom"?
 == Durand Conundrum ==

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:57, 2 November 2013
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	== Elections ==
		+	Shouldn't "This should be a private election with no one able to determine who has voted for who" end with "whom"?
		+
	== Durand Conundrum ==		== Durand Conundrum ==

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:04, 18 March 2012
Line 1:		Line 1:
	== Durand Conundrum ==		== Durand Conundrum ==

−	I'm told there's something called the "Durand Conundrum". Though it hasn't yet come up in Council discussions, it would be good to add a note on the TEI-Council-FAQ because I don't think there's any more appropriate place to put this.	+	I'm told there's something called the "Durand Conundrum". Though it hasn't yet come up in Council discussions, it would be good to add a note on the TEI-Council-FAQ because I don't think there's any more appropriate place to put this. ([[User:kshawkin\|kshawkin]] 15 April 2010)
		+
		+	: Thanks, James, for adding. I think I understand the Conundrum now, but still this sentence doesn't quite parse: "The 'Durand Conundrum' was suggested by David G. Durand concerning the TEI's decision to use the [[ODD\|TEI ODD]] meta-schema language rather than just one of the existing schema languages, or if you are going to use your own language, why use RelaxNG as part of that language for describing content models." I propose revising as:
		+
		+	: The "Durand Conundrum" was formulated by David G. Durand and actually contains two conundrums:
		+
		+	:* Why does the TEI use the [[ODD\|TEI ODD]] meta-schema language rather than simply using one of the existing schema languages?
		+	:* Why does our meta-schema language use RelaxNG as part of that language for describing content models?
		+
		+	: ([[User:Kshawkin\|Kshawkin]] 15:04, 18 March 2012 (EDT))