User talk:Stéphane Thibault - Revision history

Stéphane Thibault: Link to my reply

2008-04-11T16:57:38Z

Link to my reply

Piotr Banski: /* Root */

2008-04-11T16:50:27Z

‎Root

Piotr Banski: /* Root */

2008-04-11T16:49:31Z

‎Root

Stéphane Thibault: + Contact form

2008-04-11T16:48:48Z

+ Contact form

Piotr Banski: /* Root */

2008-04-11T16:21:25Z

‎Root

Piotr Banski: Root

2008-04-11T16:11:15Z

Root

New page

== Root ==

Hi Stéphane. [[:Category:TEI Wiki]] is not the root category. It's a category for TEI Wiki matters. There is no single root here (and no need for one, I'd venture). Best, [[User:Piotr Banski|Piotr]] 12:11, 11 April 2008 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:57, 11 April 2008
Line 10:		Line 10:
	:I've been a wiki user for a while and watched the introduction of that extension and you are right, it's useful. Was thinking of a root category here, but that was in the old days when the wiki software here was too ancient to try anything fancy, and setting up the root just for the sake of it being there struck me as possibly being my own bias (dealing with single-root trees every day, and they aren't necessarily XML trees), overmeticulousness, or whatever. And I didn't want to go too far, being new here myself. So I was ok with gathering all loose categories into those few basic ones, and linking them from the main page.		:I've been a wiki user for a while and watched the introduction of that extension and you are right, it's useful. Was thinking of a root category here, but that was in the old days when the wiki software here was too ancient to try anything fancy, and setting up the root just for the sake of it being there struck me as possibly being my own bias (dealing with single-root trees every day, and they aren't necessarily XML trees), overmeticulousness, or whatever. And I didn't want to go too far, being new here myself. So I was ok with gathering all loose categories into those few basic ones, and linking them from the main page.
	:I don't see anything bad in trying something new, especially if there is a chance of it being useful/more user-friendly. So I'd say, go ahead. James Cummings is the person to contact about installing the extension. [[User:Piotr Banski\|Piotr]] 12:49, 11 April 2008 (EDT)		:I don't see anything bad in trying something new, especially if there is a chance of it being useful/more user-friendly. So I'd say, go ahead. James Cummings is the person to contact about installing the extension. [[User:Piotr Banski\|Piotr]] 12:49, 11 April 2008 (EDT)
		+
		+	[[User talk:Piotr Banski#Re: Root category\|Re: Root category]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:50, 11 April 2008
Line 9:		Line 9:

	:I've been a wiki user for a while and watched the introduction of that extension and you are right, it's useful. Was thinking of a root category here, but that was in the old days when the wiki software here was too ancient to try anything fancy, and setting up the root just for the sake of it being there struck me as possibly being my own bias (dealing with single-root trees every day, and they aren't necessarily XML trees), overmeticulousness, or whatever. And I didn't want to go too far, being new here myself. So I was ok with gathering all loose categories into those few basic ones, and linking them from the main page.		:I've been a wiki user for a while and watched the introduction of that extension and you are right, it's useful. Was thinking of a root category here, but that was in the old days when the wiki software here was too ancient to try anything fancy, and setting up the root just for the sake of it being there struck me as possibly being my own bias (dealing with single-root trees every day, and they aren't necessarily XML trees), overmeticulousness, or whatever. And I didn't want to go too far, being new here myself. So I was ok with gathering all loose categories into those few basic ones, and linking them from the main page.
−	:I don't see anything bad in trying something new, especially if there is a chance of it being useful/more user-friendly. So I'd say, go ahead. ~~I think~~ James Cummings is the person to contact about installing the extension. [[User:Piotr Banski\|Piotr]] 12:49, 11 April 2008 (EDT)	+	:I don't see anything bad in trying something new, especially if there is a chance of it being useful/more user-friendly. So I'd say, go ahead. James Cummings is the person to contact about installing the extension. [[User:Piotr Banski\|Piotr]] 12:49, 11 April 2008 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:49, 11 April 2008
Line 7:		Line 7:

	:Hi again. [[TEIWiki:IdleTalk#Category_trees\|Here's the place]] where the category structure is open for discussion. Have a look at it, please and feel welcome to join in. I'd say, if you really think we need a single root category, maybe a new one would be better. Cheers, [[User:Piotr Banski\|Piotr]] 12:21, 11 April 2008 (EDT)		:Hi again. [[TEIWiki:IdleTalk#Category_trees\|Here's the place]] where the category structure is open for discussion. Have a look at it, please and feel welcome to join in. I'd say, if you really think we need a single root category, maybe a new one would be better. Cheers, [[User:Piotr Banski\|Piotr]] 12:21, 11 April 2008 (EDT)
		+
		+	:I've been a wiki user for a while and watched the introduction of that extension and you are right, it's useful. Was thinking of a root category here, but that was in the old days when the wiki software here was too ancient to try anything fancy, and setting up the root just for the sake of it being there struck me as possibly being my own bias (dealing with single-root trees every day, and they aren't necessarily XML trees), overmeticulousness, or whatever. And I didn't want to go too far, being new here myself. So I was ok with gathering all loose categories into those few basic ones, and linking them from the main page.
		+	:I don't see anything bad in trying something new, especially if there is a chance of it being useful/more user-friendly. So I'd say, go ahead. I think James Cummings is the person to contact about installing the extension. [[User:Piotr Banski\|Piotr]] 12:49, 11 April 2008 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:48, 11 April 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	;As I am only an occasional visitor of this website, for a faster response, please use [[Special:Emailuser/Stéphane Thibault\|this form]].
		+
		+
	== Root ==		== Root ==

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:21, 11 April 2008
Line 2:		Line 2:

	Hi Stéphane. [[:Category:TEI Wiki]] is not the root category. It's a category for TEI Wiki matters. There is no single root here (and no need for one, I'd venture). Best, [[User:Piotr Banski\|Piotr]] 12:11, 11 April 2008 (EDT)		Hi Stéphane. [[:Category:TEI Wiki]] is not the root category. It's a category for TEI Wiki matters. There is no single root here (and no need for one, I'd venture). Best, [[User:Piotr Banski\|Piotr]] 12:11, 11 April 2008 (EDT)
		+
		+	:Hi again. [[TEIWiki:IdleTalk#Category_trees\|Here's the place]] where the category structure is open for discussion. Have a look at it, please and feel welcome to join in. I'd say, if you really think we need a single root category, maybe a new one would be better. Cheers, [[User:Piotr Banski\|Piotr]] 12:21, 11 April 2008 (EDT)