Difference between revisions of "SIGMS Minutes 20111014"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Participants) |
|||
| (17 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
* Elena Pierazzo (EP) | * Elena Pierazzo (EP) | ||
* Marjorie Burghardt (MB) | * Marjorie Burghardt (MB) | ||
| − | * . | + | * Torsten Schaßan (TS) |
| + | * Christian Wittern (CW) | ||
| + | * Ron Van den Branden (RB) | ||
| + | * Joachim Veit (JV) | ||
| + | * Malte Rehbein (MR) | ||
| + | * Oliver Gasperlin (OG) | ||
| + | * Gregor Middell (GM) – minutes | ||
| + | * Benjamin W. Bohl (BWB) | ||
| + | * ''(many more, please add your name here)'' | ||
== Introduction (EP) == | == Introduction (EP) == | ||
| Line 14: | Line 22: | ||
** '''Manuscript description''': extension of existing means with dimensions like time, geospatial information etc., problem of scope (to what extent are we talking about manuscripts or about cultural artifacts in general) | ** '''Manuscript description''': extension of existing means with dimensions like time, geospatial information etc., problem of scope (to what extent are we talking about manuscripts or about cultural artifacts in general) | ||
* organizational matters, some financial support by the TEI available, communication via [http://listserv.brown.edu/tei-ms-sig.html mailing list], [[SIG:MSS|wiki]] and [http://www.tei-c.org/SIG/Manuscripts/ web-site] | * organizational matters, some financial support by the TEI available, communication via [http://listserv.brown.edu/tei-ms-sig.html mailing list], [[SIG:MSS|wiki]] and [http://www.tei-c.org/SIG/Manuscripts/ web-site] | ||
| + | * call for participation | ||
| + | |||
| + | == What should we do, what could you do? == | ||
| + | |||
| + | * TS: ODDs from [http://enrich.manuscriptorium.com/ ENRICH project] available | ||
| + | * support for marginal notes in the Guidelines/ SIG proposal | ||
| + | * manuscript description: <summary/> content model is not flexible enough for more complex descriptions (e.g. <p/>) | ||
| + | * CW: there are – apart from the SIG – means to address such issues, for example the [http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?atid=644065&group_id=106328&func=browse Sourceforge Issue Tracker] | ||
| + | * EP: SIG can act as a proxy though | ||
| + | * RB: we could extend [http://tbe.kantl.be/TBE/ TEI by Example] with manuscript-related resources | ||
| + | * TS: refering to ENRICH again, there are existing resources and documentation for manuscript description, including conversion scenarios (TEI, EAD, ...) | ||
| + | * JV: structure of text is sometimes hard to describe with existing elements, not a problem of manuscripts alone, maybe some conceptual overlap with manuscript description | ||
| + | * EP: SIG "Text-Bearing Objects" might be a good place to address this | ||
| + | * idea about further modularizing the TEI, e.g. via use of different namespaces, address different use cases this way | ||
| + | * MR: problem of SIG's scope, lots of interest in manuscripts, but how to derive concrete tasks from that, maybe should come up with a new definition of what the SIG should do | ||
| + | * OG: supports idea of asking for micropapers before SIG meetings | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[Category:SIG|MSS]] | ||
| + | [[Category:SIG:Manuscripts]] | ||
Latest revision as of 09:36, 20 October 2011
Participants
- Elena Pierazzo (EP)
- Marjorie Burghardt (MB)
- Torsten Schaßan (TS)
- Christian Wittern (CW)
- Ron Van den Branden (RB)
- Joachim Veit (JV)
- Malte Rehbein (MR)
- Oliver Gasperlin (OG)
- Gregor Middell (GM) – minutes
- Benjamin W. Bohl (BWB)
- (many more, please add your name here)
Introduction (EP)
- introduction of participants
- explains relationship and interdependencies to other SIGs (Facsimile, Libraries, ...), willingness to contribute vs. ability to do so on a persistent basis, problem of time constraints, financial and other resources as well as attribution of work in the SIGs
- outline of current activities
- Genetic editing: Council adopts recommendations of the SIG WG, will be circulated for the first time shortly; likely to be included in the next release of the Guidelines
- Critical Apparatus: chapter in the Guidelines has not been revised since P4, automatic collation vs. manual construction of a CA, question of relationship between the two, MB appointed as leader of a WG to improve on this situation
- Manuscript description: extension of existing means with dimensions like time, geospatial information etc., problem of scope (to what extent are we talking about manuscripts or about cultural artifacts in general)
- organizational matters, some financial support by the TEI available, communication via mailing list, wiki and web-site
- call for participation
What should we do, what could you do?
- TS: ODDs from ENRICH project available
- support for marginal notes in the Guidelines/ SIG proposal
- manuscript description: <summary/> content model is not flexible enough for more complex descriptions (e.g. <p/>)
- CW: there are – apart from the SIG – means to address such issues, for example the Sourceforge Issue Tracker
- EP: SIG can act as a proxy though
- RB: we could extend TEI by Example with manuscript-related resources
- TS: refering to ENRICH again, there are existing resources and documentation for manuscript description, including conversion scenarios (TEI, EAD, ...)
- JV: structure of text is sometimes hard to describe with existing elements, not a problem of manuscripts alone, maybe some conceptual overlap with manuscript description
- EP: SIG "Text-Bearing Objects" might be a good place to address this
- idea about further modularizing the TEI, e.g. via use of different namespaces, address different use cases this way
- MR: problem of SIG's scope, lots of interest in manuscripts, but how to derive concrete tasks from that, maybe should come up with a new definition of what the SIG should do
- OG: supports idea of asking for micropapers before SIG meetings
