Difference between revisions of "Agenda for March 24, 2009"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(fixed category) |
(note on header mechanism for linking to outside metadata) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
* Reckoning | * Reckoning | ||
| + | ** Header: | ||
| + | *** Kevin has an email query to Syd regarding mechanisms for linking to outside metadata. | ||
** Level 1: Lisa, is there anything left to do on this? | ** Level 1: Lisa, is there anything left to do on this? | ||
** Level 2 | ** Level 2 | ||
Revision as of 21:00, 22 March 2009
- Reckoning
- Header:
- Kevin has an email query to Syd regarding mechanisms for linking to outside metadata.
- Level 1: Lisa, is there anything left to do on this?
- Level 2
- Example has <figure> and <graphic> in it. Should these be here?
- Level 3
- Add recommendation on removing forme work artifacts from OCR?
- Level 4: update from Natasha
- Level 5: update from Natasha
- Header:
- Overarching issues:
- Syd, do you have any more thought on <pb>s and <div>s based on Perry's reply to your email (both messages sent March 3)?
- Discuss handling of examples:
- Eventually all examples should probably be included in the document, not simply linked to. However, they can remain external even through the public review period.
- Do we shoow a single text encoded at various levels? Kevin inserted a Level 1 example, which is quite short and might actually work well for all levels. (A PDF of original, a public-domain document, is at http://www.ultraslavonic.info/teiinlibraries/hiss1111.0100.001.pdf .) This doesn't mean we couldn't keep extra examples as well -- we would certainly need extras for Level 4 and 5.
