Difference between revisions of "Minutes from June 2, 2010"

From TEIWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (cleaning up the minutes)
m (cleaning up the minutes)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
[[Category:SIG:Libraries|sort-key]]
 
[[Category:SIG:Libraries|sort-key]]
  
Conference Call about Revising the TEI in Libraries Best Practice Guidelines
+
 
 +
== Conference Call about Revising the TEI in Libraries Best Practice Guidelines ==
 +
 
  
 
'''Attendees:''' Syd Bauman, Michelle Dalmau, Kevin Hawkins,  Lisa McAulay (notetaker), Melanie Schlosser, Natasha Smith, Perry Willett, Glen Worthey
 
'''Attendees:''' Syd Bauman, Michelle Dalmau, Kevin Hawkins,  Lisa McAulay (notetaker), Melanie Schlosser, Natasha Smith, Perry Willett, Glen Worthey
Line 10: Line 12:
 
'''DECISION:''' We agreed on option E for TEI-To-MARC mapping approach for the [http://wiki.tei-c.org/index.php/Image:SIG-CFP-2010_Libraries-2.pdf#filelinks|SIG grant]
 
'''DECISION:''' We agreed on option E for TEI-To-MARC mapping approach for the [http://wiki.tei-c.org/index.php/Image:SIG-CFP-2010_Libraries-2.pdf#filelinks|SIG grant]
  
'''ACTION ITEM: Kevin''' will contact Michael and let him know we choose Option E.
+
'''ACTION ITEM: Kevin''' will contact Michael and let him know we choose Option E. Kevin will ask Michael whether having our work done by early fall will give him time enough to complete his work by the end of December 2010 (when we need to have spent the SIG grant money by).  
''
+
 
Discussion overview''
+
''Discussion overview''
 
*We discussed point "C" -- we agreed that 'beautification' is likely to be a losing battle (stripping punctuation marks, etc.) and it's better not to put time / effort into  
 
*We discussed point "C" -- we agreed that 'beautification' is likely to be a losing battle (stripping punctuation marks, etc.) and it's better not to put time / effort into  
 
*Note that Option E includes only A & B (does not include C & D).
 
*Note that Option E includes only A & B (does not include C & D).
Line 27: Line 29:
 
'''DECISION:''' We will select specific attributes to include.  
 
'''DECISION:''' We will select specific attributes to include.  
  
'''ACTION ITEM: Lisa''' will compile a list
+
'''ACTION ITEM: Lisa''' will compile a list of "include" and "exclude" attributes
 +
'''Michelle''' will revise the language to indicate this is a section of the guidelines we need to come back to
  
 
*For background, see [[Talk:Best_Practices_for_TEI_in_Libraries#Pending_Review:_Use_of_any_P5_attributes|link]]
 
*For background, see [[Talk:Best_Practices_for_TEI_in_Libraries#Pending_Review:_Use_of_any_P5_attributes|link]]
 
'''
 
'''
Syd registers a minority opinion. Discussion ensues.
+
''Discussion Overview''
Look at attributes we have used so far in the Best Practices.
+
* Syd proposed that selecting attributes is a lot more helpful than allowing everything; the group discussed pros and cons
438 attributes in TEI P5 -- some of these are repeats in different modules
+
** It sounds like a gargantuan task to run through all the attributes and evaluate yes/no and try to conceive of all the scenarios
choosing what attributes we're going to allow in the TEI for Libraries BP
+
** One starting place, is the attributes we have used so far in the Best Practices Guidelines -- in the narrative and in the examples
Michelle will revise language to flag it as something we need to come back to.
+
** Syd determined there are 438 attributes in TEI P5 -- some of these are repeats in different modules
Lisa will take a first pass at the list of all attributes and strike through
+
 
 +
'''3. BPG document: Publication Statement structure'''
 +
 
 +
See [[Talk:Best_Practices_for_TEI_in_Libraries#Publication_Statement|link]]
 +
 
 +
'''DECISION:''' This was a red herring. Because we do not use PublicationStmt in the Source Description, there is no problem. The guidelines stand as they are.  
 +
 
 +
'''4. BPG Document: <tt>&lt;meeting></tt> element in teiHeader'''
  
**''' publication statement structure [[Talk:Best_Practices_for_TEI_in_Libraries#Publication_Statement|link]]'''
+
See, [[Talk:Best_Practices_for_TEI_in_Libraries#meeting_element|link]]
  
Because publication statement is only used in File Description (i.e., NOT in Source Description), then there is no conflict here. The guidelines stand as they are.
+
'''DECISION:''' Allow <tt>&lt;meeting></tt>  in teiHeader
  
**''' <tt>&lt;meeting></tt> [[Talk:Best_Practices_for_TEI_in_Libraries#meeting_element|link]]''' (that section says there’s e-mail from Kevin on 10-12, but I haven’t found it yet — Syd)
+
* (that section says there’s e-mail from Kevin on 10-12, but I haven’t found it yet — Syd)
 +
''Discussion Overview''
 +
*Discussion of where the meeting might occur in the MARC; Kevin will check in with Renee at UNC-Chapel Hill
  
Do we want to keep the meeting element or no?
+
'''4. BPG Document: <tt>&lt;appInfo</tt>'''
We agree to allow meeting in the teiHeader
 
Discussion of where the meeting might occur in the MARC; Kevin will check in with Renne at UNC-Chapel Hill
 
  
 +
See, [[Talk:Best_Practices_for_TEI_in_Libraries#appInfo_and_application|link]]
  
** '''<tt>&lt;appInfo</tt> [[Talk:Best_Practices_for_TEI_in_Libraries#appInfo_and_application|link]]''' (I think we may be able to just resolve this on the call — Syd)
+
'''DECISION:''' We will not include <tt>&lt;appInfo></tt> in BPG.
  
It's not likely that this tag will be used. So, we will exclude. If someone wants to use it, they will need to say, "I'm using BPG Level 3 plus appInfo."
+
''Discussion Overview''
 +
*It's not likely that this tag will be used. So, we will exclude. If someone wants to use it, they will need to say, "I'm using BPG Level 3 plus appInfo."
  
** '''v. 3 hx [[Talk:Best_Practices_for_TEI_in_Libraries#Add_history_of_version_3_to_Appendix_A|link]]'''
+
'''5. BPG Document: History of Version 3 of the BPG [[Talk:Best_Practices_for_TEI_in_Libraries#Add_history_of_version_3_to_Appendix_A|link]]'''
  
'''Michelle''' will do a draft on completing this section. (We're up to Minneapolis)
+
'''DECISION:''' We need someone to draft the remainder of this section.
 +
 
 +
'''ACTION ITEM: Michelle''' will do a draft on completing this section. (We're up to Minneapolis DLF meeting April 2008)
 
   
 
   
  
** '''Tite == 3.5 ? [[Talk:Best_Practices_for_TEI_in_Libraries#Add_Tite_as_Level_3.5|link]]'''
+
'''6. TEITite and AccessTEI as relates to BPG document '''
 +
See [[Talk:Best_Practices_for_TEI_in_Libraries#Add_Tite_as_Level_3.5|link]].
 +
 
 +
 
 +
'''DECISION:''' TEITite and AccessTEI will be addressed as a "sidebar" in the BPG Document
 +
 
 +
'''ACTION ITEM: All''' will look at Michelle's revision in the Talk page''; '''Kevin''', in particular, volunteered to look at Michelle's draft.
 +
 
 +
''Discussion Overview''
 +
 
 +
* Michelle wrote some stuff up in the Talk page to develop this. Michelle tried teases out -- see the "pending review" section
 +
* Right now, this topic is covered in the Introductory Prose
 +
* The Tite Spec is undergoing review/revision right now, so the Spec/schema is not stable. We don't know when the revisions will be complete.
 +
* Level 3.5 = TEI Tite will be a sidebar
 +
 
 +
 
 +
'''7. BPG Document : Hyphenation'''
 +
 
 +
See [[Talk:Best_Practices_for_TEI_in_Libraries#Revise_section_on_hyphenation|link]]
 +
 
 +
'''DECISION:''' tabled until next call.
 +
 
 +
'''8. odds issues'''
 +
 
 +
See [[Talk:Best_Practices_for_TEI_in_Libraries#Test_ODDs_and_schemas_derived_from_them|link]]
 +
 
 +
'''DECISION:''' We don't need to discuss right now. Syd will revamp the ODDs, and then we will review again. He will address the list of issues in his revision
 +
 
 +
* Note: Syd will not be able to work on the ODDs until after DH in London.
 +
 
 +
'''9. Determine timeline'''
 +
 
 +
'''DECISION:''' We will make a full timeline during our next call.
 +
 
 +
'''DECISION:''' Our next call will be within the next 2-3 weeks.
  
Michelle wrote some stuff up in the Talk page to develop this. Michelle tried teases out -- see the "pending review"
+
'''DECISION:''' All action items above should be addressed prior to the next call.
Introductory Prose
 
FYI, the Tite Spec is undergoing review.
 
Level 3.5 = TEI Tite will be a sidebar
 
'''Kevin''' will take a look at Michelle's revision.
 
'''All''' please take a look at Michelle's revision.
 
We don't know when TEI Tite will be a stable spec
 
  
** '''hyphenation''' [[Talk:Best_Practices_for_TEI_in_Libraries#Revise_section_on_hyphenation|link]] (I think we may be able to just resolve this on the call — Syd)
+
'''ACTION ITEM: Michelle''' will send out a Doodle poll.
  
** '''odds issues''' [[Talk:Best_Practices_for_TEI_in_Libraries#Test_ODDs_and_schemas_derived_from_them|link]]
+
'''ACTION ITEM: Perry''' will coordinate conference call through CDL
  
Syd is going to revamp the ODDs, so we don't need to
+
'''10. Other announcements'''
  
* '''Determine timeline'''
+
*Michelle is going to talk to Rachel Frick (new leader of DLF) about continued support for the BPG group.
1st Deadline: have a call within the next two weeks; Please try to have your "to do" items done in time for the next call.
 
'''Michelle''' will send out a Doodle poll.
 
CDL can provide conferencing support for now; Perry will coordinate.
 
Kevin will ask Michael whether having our work done by early fall will give him time enough to complete his work by the end of December 2010 (when we need to have spent the SIG grant money by).
 
Michelle is going to talk to Rachel Frick (new leader of DLF) about continued support for the BPG group.
 

Revision as of 21:14, 3 June 2010


Conference Call about Revising the TEI in Libraries Best Practice Guidelines

Attendees: Syd Bauman, Michelle Dalmau, Kevin Hawkins, Lisa McAulay (notetaker), Melanie Schlosser, Natasha Smith, Perry Willett, Glen Worthey


1. SIG Grant for Thutmouse: Discuss options outlined by Michael Spurberg-McQueen for further work

DECISION: We agreed on option E for TEI-To-MARC mapping approach for the grant

ACTION ITEM: Kevin will contact Michael and let him know we choose Option E. Kevin will ask Michael whether having our work done by early fall will give him time enough to complete his work by the end of December 2010 (when we need to have spent the SIG grant money by).

Discussion overview

  • We discussed point "C" -- we agreed that 'beautification' is likely to be a losing battle (stripping punctuation marks, etc.) and it's better not to put time / effort into
  • Note that Option E includes only A & B (does not include C & D).
  • Brief discussion of thutmouse in general (see documentation)
    • Do we have a testing scenario for what Michael has already done?
    • Kevin provided Michael 1,000 MARC records to test (see also January 16 email from Kevin)
    • See also, tools page in TEI wiki
    • We discussed how to handle comments on how the C & D portions of Thutmouse work; we agreed that we can compile feedback related to C & D aspects, even though we're not contracting Michael to do any further work on that. We'll probably have feedback, and if Michael can't work on them, we can save them for later work that may be funded for Michael to work on or that someone else will want to work on
    • Add support for all MARC fields mentioned in the Best Practices and for all three mapping variants (source, tei-from-source, and tei-from-digital).
members (see http://wiki.tei-c.org/index.php/Talk:Best_Practices_for_TEI_in_Libraries)

2. BPG document: Discussion of whether to Include All OR Select specific P5 attributes within <text>

DECISION: We will select specific attributes to include.

ACTION ITEM: Lisa will compile a list of "include" and "exclude" attributes Michelle will revise the language to indicate this is a section of the guidelines we need to come back to

  • For background, see link

Discussion Overview

  • Syd proposed that selecting attributes is a lot more helpful than allowing everything; the group discussed pros and cons
    • It sounds like a gargantuan task to run through all the attributes and evaluate yes/no and try to conceive of all the scenarios
    • One starting place, is the attributes we have used so far in the Best Practices Guidelines -- in the narrative and in the examples
    • Syd determined there are 438 attributes in TEI P5 -- some of these are repeats in different modules

3. BPG document: Publication Statement structure

See link

DECISION: This was a red herring. Because we do not use PublicationStmt in the Source Description, there is no problem. The guidelines stand as they are.

4. BPG Document: <meeting> element in teiHeader

See, link

DECISION: Allow <meeting> in teiHeader

  • (that section says there’s e-mail from Kevin on 10-12, but I haven’t found it yet — Syd)

Discussion Overview

  • Discussion of where the meeting might occur in the MARC; Kevin will check in with Renee at UNC-Chapel Hill

4. BPG Document: <appInfo

See, link

DECISION: We will not include <appInfo> in BPG.

Discussion Overview

  • It's not likely that this tag will be used. So, we will exclude. If someone wants to use it, they will need to say, "I'm using BPG Level 3 plus appInfo."

5. BPG Document: History of Version 3 of the BPG link

DECISION: We need someone to draft the remainder of this section.

ACTION ITEM: Michelle will do a draft on completing this section. (We're up to Minneapolis DLF meeting April 2008)


6. TEITite and AccessTEI as relates to BPG document See link.


DECISION: TEITite and AccessTEI will be addressed as a "sidebar" in the BPG Document

ACTION ITEM: All will look at Michelle's revision in the Talk page; Kevin, in particular, volunteered to look at Michelle's draft.

Discussion Overview

  • Michelle wrote some stuff up in the Talk page to develop this. Michelle tried teases out -- see the "pending review" section
  • Right now, this topic is covered in the Introductory Prose
  • The Tite Spec is undergoing review/revision right now, so the Spec/schema is not stable. We don't know when the revisions will be complete.
  • Level 3.5 = TEI Tite will be a sidebar


7. BPG Document : Hyphenation

See link

DECISION: tabled until next call.

8. odds issues

See link

DECISION: We don't need to discuss right now. Syd will revamp the ODDs, and then we will review again. He will address the list of issues in his revision

  • Note: Syd will not be able to work on the ODDs until after DH in London.

9. Determine timeline

DECISION: We will make a full timeline during our next call.

DECISION: Our next call will be within the next 2-3 weeks.

DECISION: All action items above should be addressed prior to the next call.

ACTION ITEM: Michelle will send out a Doodle poll.

ACTION ITEM: Perry will coordinate conference call through CDL

10. Other announcements

  • Michelle is going to talk to Rachel Frick (new leader of DLF) about continued support for the BPG group.