Difference between revisions of "Talk:Recommended Practices"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Piotr Banski (talk | contribs) m |
m |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Am I right that this page is specifically for the [[SIG:Scholarly_Publishing]] page? If so, there's no indication that it is. --[[User:Joewiz|Joewiz]] 12:02, 18 October 2010 (EDT) | Am I right that this page is specifically for the [[SIG:Scholarly_Publishing]] page? If so, there's no indication that it is. --[[User:Joewiz|Joewiz]] 12:02, 18 October 2010 (EDT) | ||
:Thanks, Joe. A single naming scheme is probably unenforceable, and there are quite a lot of pages with very general titles like this one. What I (and others) can do is create categories to bind them, which I did now in this case. [[User:Piotr Banski|Piotr]] 04:26, 19 October 2010 (EDT) | :Thanks, Joe. A single naming scheme is probably unenforceable, and there are quite a lot of pages with very general titles like this one. What I (and others) can do is create categories to bind them, which I did now in this case. [[User:Piotr Banski|Piotr]] 04:26, 19 October 2010 (EDT) | ||
+ | ::Thanks, Piotr! The category idea is great. --[[User:Joewiz|Joewiz]] 08:15, 19 October 2010 (EDT) |
Latest revision as of 14:15, 19 October 2010
Am I right that this page is specifically for the SIG:Scholarly_Publishing page? If so, there's no indication that it is. --Joewiz 12:02, 18 October 2010 (EDT)
- Thanks, Joe. A single naming scheme is probably unenforceable, and there are quite a lot of pages with very general titles like this one. What I (and others) can do is create categories to bind them, which I did now in this case. Piotr 04:26, 19 October 2010 (EDT)
- Thanks, Piotr! The category idea is great. --Joewiz 08:15, 19 October 2010 (EDT)