Difference between revisions of "Level 1 Schema and Schematron Feedback"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Tester: Enter Your Name: took this section and added note about use of elementSpec) |
(→Tester: Kevin Hawkins: now say to omit entire element defintion) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
==Tester: Kevin Hawkins== | ==Tester: Kevin Hawkins== | ||
| − | * Most <elementSpec>s have examples that are taken exactly from P5 but do not validate according to the ODD itself. I recommend omitting all | + | * Most <elementSpec>s have examples that are taken exactly from P5 but do not validate according to the ODD itself. Furthermore, definitions sometimes refer to sections of P5 with pointers such as <code><ptr target="#SACR"/></code> , which don't resolver. I recommend omitting all element definitions since creation and maintenance of these is too much for us to undertake. |
==Tester: Enter Your Name== | ==Tester: Enter Your Name== | ||
Revision as of 19:55, 1 May 2011
>>Return to testing instructions: Feedback_on_the_Best_Practices_for_TEI_in_Libraries_ODD_Documentation_and_Schemas
Tester: Kevin Hawkins
- Most <elementSpec>s have examples that are taken exactly from P5 but do not validate according to the ODD itself. Furthermore, definitions sometimes refer to sections of P5 with pointers such as
<ptr target="#SACR"/>, which don't resolver. I recommend omitting all element definitions since creation and maintenance of these is too much for us to undertake.
Tester: Enter Your Name
Comments/Feedback
- List feedback, problems encountered, etc. in bulleted list form. Provide detailed examples please so that we may make corrections more easily.
- Feedback
- Feedback
Tester: Enter Your Name
Comments/Feedback
- List feedback, problems encountered, etc. in bulleted list form. Provide detailed examples please so that we may make corrections more easily.
- Feedback
- Feedback
