Difference between revisions of "Level 2 Prose Documentation Feedback"

From TEIWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
 
>>Return to testing instructions: [[Feedback_on_the_Best_Practices_for_TEI_in_Libraries_ODD_Documentation_and_Schemas]]
 
>>Return to testing instructions: [[Feedback_on_the_Best_Practices_for_TEI_in_Libraries_ODD_Documentation_and_Schemas]]
  
==Tester: Enter Your Name==
+
==Tester: Melanie Schlosser==
  
 
'''Comments/Feedback'''
 
'''Comments/Feedback'''
  
* List feedback, problems encountered, etc. in bulleted list form. Provide detailed examples please so that we may make corrections more easily.
+
* Extra sentence in the ODD file under 'Reference': "Note that this is a ‘syntactically conformant’ customization, in that documents that are valid against this scheme will also be valid against the TEI_all schema. However, it is unkown whether or not it is truly ‘TEI conformant’, as the TEI Guidelines do not make clear whether or not encoding of individual paragraphs is mandatory."
* Feedback
+
* Example 1: Same comment about the Header element as in level 1.  
* Feedback
+
* Example 1: The child elements of the optional 'front' element are missing.
 +
* Example 1: Information missing from 'back' illustration: "organized like <front>, with 1 or more <div> or <div1>,each with a single <ab>"
 +
* I didn't look at anything on the ODD after the 2nd example.
  
 
==Tester: Enter Your Name==
 
==Tester: Enter Your Name==

Revision as of 19:01, 20 May 2011

>>Return to testing instructions: Feedback_on_the_Best_Practices_for_TEI_in_Libraries_ODD_Documentation_and_Schemas

Tester: Melanie Schlosser

Comments/Feedback

  • Extra sentence in the ODD file under 'Reference': "Note that this is a ‘syntactically conformant’ customization, in that documents that are valid against this scheme will also be valid against the TEI_all schema. However, it is unkown whether or not it is truly ‘TEI conformant’, as the TEI Guidelines do not make clear whether or not encoding of individual paragraphs is mandatory."
  • Example 1: Same comment about the Header element as in level 1.
  • Example 1: The child elements of the optional 'front' element are missing.
  • Example 1: Information missing from 'back' illustration: "organized like <front>, with 1 or more
    or <div1>,each with a single <ab>"
  • I didn't look at anything on the ODD after the 2nd example.

Tester: Enter Your Name

Comments/Feedback

  • List feedback, problems encountered, etc. in bulleted list form. Provide detailed examples please so that we may make corrections more easily.
  • Feedback
  • Feedback

Tester: Enter Your Name

Comments/Feedback

  • List feedback, problems encountered, etc. in bulleted list form. Provide detailed examples please so that we may make corrections more easily.
  • Feedback
  • Feedback