Difference between revisions of "Level 3 Schema and Schematron Feedback"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Tester: Enter Your Name: what Sebastian sent by email) |
(→Tester: Kevin Hawkins: hi@rend not valid) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
==Tester: Kevin Hawkins== | ==Tester: Kevin Hawkins== | ||
| − | * Most <elementSpec>s have examples that are taken exactly from P5 but do not validate according to the ODD itself. Furthermore, definitions sometimes refer to sections of P5 with pointers such as <code><ptr target="#SACR"/></code> , which don't | + | * Most <code>elementSpec</code>s have examples that are taken exactly from P5 but do not validate according to the ODD itself. Furthermore, definitions sometimes refer to sections of P5 with pointers such as <code><ptr target="#SACR"/></code> , which don't resolve. I recommend omitting all element definitions since creation and maintenance of these is too much for us to undertake. |
| + | * <code>hi</code> won't accept <code>rend</code> attribute. | ||
==Tester: Sebastian Rahtz== | ==Tester: Sebastian Rahtz== | ||
Revision as of 02:15, 30 June 2011
>>Return to testing instructions: Feedback_on_the_Best_Practices_for_TEI_in_Libraries_ODD_Documentation_and_Schemas
Tester: Kevin Hawkins
- Most
elementSpecs have examples that are taken exactly from P5 but do not validate according to the ODD itself. Furthermore, definitions sometimes refer to sections of P5 with pointers such as<ptr target="#SACR"/>, which don't resolve. I recommend omitting all element definitions since creation and maintenance of these is too much for us to undertake. hiwon't acceptrendattribute.
Tester: Sebastian Rahtz
In an email, Sebastian wrote: surely & inside <egXML> is not intended?
Tester: Enter Your Name
Comments/Feedback
- List feedback, problems encountered, etc. in bulleted list form. Provide detailed examples please so that we may make corrections more easily.
- Feedback
- Feedback
