Difference between revisions of "Council-licensing"

From TEIWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 33: Line 33:
 
|-
 
|-
 
| TEIOO
 
| TEIOO
| GNU LGPL 2.1 <br/>(though LICENSE file has GPL 2.0)
+
| GNU LGPL 2.1 <br/>(though LICENSE file has [http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-2.0.html GNU GPL 2.0])
| GNU LGPL 3.0?
+
| [http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/gpl.html GNU GPL 3.0]?
 
|-
 
|-
 
|Wiki  
 
|Wiki  
Line 50: Line 50:
 
| Vesta
 
| Vesta
 
| GPL
 
| GPL
| GPL 3.0
+
| [http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/gpl.html GNU GPL 3.0]
 
|-  
 
|-  
 
| TEI CSS
 
| TEI CSS
Line 57: Line 57:
 
|-
 
|-
 
| PassiveTeX (SR/Oxford) <br/>(Should probably be removed from TEI-C repository?)
 
| PassiveTeX (SR/Oxford) <br/>(Should probably be removed from TEI-C repository?)
| 'Free' in LICENSE but 'COPYING' file has GPL 2.0
+
| 'Free' in LICENSE but 'COPYING' file has [http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-2.0.html GNU GPL 2.0]
 
|  ??
 
|  ??
 
|}
 
|}

Revision as of 18:50, 12 September 2011

Council is looking at regularising/standardising the licences it uses for various bits of output:

Object Current Licence Proposed Licence
Guidelines GNU GPL 2.0 GNU GPL 3.0??
Stylesheets GNU LGPL 2.1 GNU LGPL 3.0
Sample ODDs 'free'
(mostly but some GPL exceptions
like teilite and tei_enrich,
and tei_tite is unlicensed)
?? CC0? LGPL? CC+By
Pre-generated Schemas 'free' (mostly) ?? CC0? LGPL? CC+By
Roma-generated Schemas Content of <availability> ??
Roma GPL ?? (LGPL 3.0?)
TEIOO GNU LGPL 2.1
(though LICENSE file has GNU GPL 2.0)
GNU GPL 3.0?
Wiki GNU FDL 1.2 GNU FDL 1.3
jTEI CC+by+nd 3.0 CC+by+nd 3.0
TEI-C Website
(other than Guidelines)
Unlicensed ??
Vesta GPL GNU GPL 3.0
TEI CSS none ??
PassiveTeX (SR/Oxford)
(Should probably be removed from TEI-C repository?)
'Free' in LICENSE but 'COPYING' file has GNU GPL 2.0 ??