Difference between revisions of "Council-licensing"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| TEIOO | | TEIOO | ||
− | | GNU LGPL 2.1 <br/>(though LICENSE file has GPL 2.0) | + | | GNU LGPL 2.1 <br/>(though LICENSE file has [http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-2.0.html GNU GPL 2.0]) |
− | | GNU | + | | [http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/gpl.html GNU GPL 3.0]? |
|- | |- | ||
|Wiki | |Wiki | ||
Line 50: | Line 50: | ||
| Vesta | | Vesta | ||
| GPL | | GPL | ||
− | | GPL 3.0 | + | | [http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/gpl.html GNU GPL 3.0] |
|- | |- | ||
| TEI CSS | | TEI CSS | ||
Line 57: | Line 57: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| PassiveTeX (SR/Oxford) <br/>(Should probably be removed from TEI-C repository?) | | PassiveTeX (SR/Oxford) <br/>(Should probably be removed from TEI-C repository?) | ||
− | | 'Free' in LICENSE but 'COPYING' file has GPL 2.0 | + | | 'Free' in LICENSE but 'COPYING' file has [http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-2.0.html GNU GPL 2.0] |
| ?? | | ?? | ||
|} | |} |
Revision as of 18:50, 12 September 2011
Council is looking at regularising/standardising the licences it uses for various bits of output:
Object | Current Licence | Proposed Licence |
Guidelines | GNU GPL 2.0 | GNU GPL 3.0?? |
Stylesheets | GNU LGPL 2.1 | GNU LGPL 3.0 |
Sample ODDs | 'free' (mostly but some GPL exceptions like teilite and tei_enrich, and tei_tite is unlicensed) |
?? CC0? LGPL? CC+By |
Pre-generated Schemas | 'free' (mostly) | ?? CC0? LGPL? CC+By |
Roma-generated Schemas | Content of <availability> | ?? |
Roma | GPL | ?? (LGPL 3.0?) |
TEIOO | GNU LGPL 2.1 (though LICENSE file has GNU GPL 2.0) |
GNU GPL 3.0? |
Wiki | GNU FDL 1.2 | GNU FDL 1.3 |
jTEI | CC+by+nd 3.0 | CC+by+nd 3.0 |
TEI-C Website (other than Guidelines) |
Unlicensed | ?? |
Vesta | GPL | GNU GPL 3.0 |
TEI CSS | none | ?? |
PassiveTeX (SR/Oxford) (Should probably be removed from TEI-C repository?) |
'Free' in LICENSE but 'COPYING' file has GNU GPL 2.0 | ?? |