Difference between revisions of "Alternatives"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Alternatives) |
Piotr Banski (talk | contribs) m (+ category) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | [[category:Genetic Editions]] | ||
== Alternatives == | == Alternatives == | ||
* Authors often record different alternatives for the same passage | * Authors often record different alternatives for the same passage | ||
| − | * the | + | * the scope of the alternatives ranges from single word (or part) to blocks (see Vetter & McDonald 2003) |
| − | * we need a mechanism able to cope with different | + | * we need a mechanism able to cope with different dimensions of alternation, similar (if not the same) to http://www.tei-c.org/release/doc/tei-p5-doc/en/html/ref-alt.html |
* respect the <alt/> element, we need also a system to declare the evidence of editorial/authorial choices. For instance in some cases we can say which alternative was preferred by the author because the text is underlined or has other functional marks (see again Vetter & McDonald 2003), or because in later draft we have evidence that one reading has been preferred | * respect the <alt/> element, we need also a system to declare the evidence of editorial/authorial choices. For instance in some cases we can say which alternative was preferred by the author because the text is underlined or has other functional marks (see again Vetter & McDonald 2003), or because in later draft we have evidence that one reading has been preferred | ||
* The proposal is therefore to create a new element or to add an attribute to <alt/> in order to link to a functional mark or an editorial discussion about a specific point. | * The proposal is therefore to create a new element or to add an attribute to <alt/> in order to link to a functional mark or an editorial discussion about a specific point. | ||
Latest revision as of 15:41, 20 March 2009
Alternatives
- Authors often record different alternatives for the same passage
- the scope of the alternatives ranges from single word (or part) to blocks (see Vetter & McDonald 2003)
- we need a mechanism able to cope with different dimensions of alternation, similar (if not the same) to http://www.tei-c.org/release/doc/tei-p5-doc/en/html/ref-alt.html
- respect the <alt/> element, we need also a system to declare the evidence of editorial/authorial choices. For instance in some cases we can say which alternative was preferred by the author because the text is underlined or has other functional marks (see again Vetter & McDonald 2003), or because in later draft we have evidence that one reading has been preferred
- The proposal is therefore to create a new element or to add an attribute to <alt/> in order to link to a functional mark or an editorial discussion about a specific point.
