Difference between revisions of "Talk:OXygen"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
"Fairly easy to use, but slow because of use of JVM, leading to cross-platform interface that doesn't feel right in any one operating system." This is rather judgmental, and I don't think all users of oXygen would agree--I use oXygen on both OS X and Windows machines and find that it's a remarkably user-friendly GUI for a Java application. Can we change this to something more neutral? --[[User:DavidSewell|DavidSewell]] 14:22, 15 March 2007 (GMT) | "Fairly easy to use, but slow because of use of JVM, leading to cross-platform interface that doesn't feel right in any one operating system." This is rather judgmental, and I don't think all users of oXygen would agree--I use oXygen on both OS X and Windows machines and find that it's a remarkably user-friendly GUI for a Java application. Can we change this to something more neutral? --[[User:DavidSewell|DavidSewell]] 14:22, 15 March 2007 (GMT) | ||
| − | : I'm open to that. I tried capturing the essence of [http://listserv.brown.edu/archives/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind0702 | + | : I'm open to that. I tried capturing the essence of [http://listserv.brown.edu/archives/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind0702 |
Revision as of 02:29, 4 July 2007
Synopsis
"Fairly easy to use, but slow because of use of JVM, leading to cross-platform interface that doesn't feel right in any one operating system." This is rather judgmental, and I don't think all users of oXygen would agree--I use oXygen on both OS X and Windows machines and find that it's a remarkably user-friendly GUI for a Java application. Can we change this to something more neutral? --DavidSewell 14:22, 15 March 2007 (GMT)
- I'm open to that. I tried capturing the essence of [http://listserv.brown.edu/archives/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind0702
