Text Directionality Draft Questions

Is the draft written at the appropriate level of detail?

There may be way too much or way too little detail here.

At the simplest level, we could say "CSS Writing Modes and CSS Transforms provide properties and values for encoding text directionality and transformation. You may wish to use them in the TEI @style attribute, or in <rendition>/@rendition," and stop there. I think that would be unhelpful and unkind, since the CSS specifications are not really human-friendly, and there are some aspects of our suggested usage which is orthogonal to the way the specifications are addressed, since we're using the CSS properties descriptively rather than prescriptively.

On the other hand, you may feel that even more detail is required, with more and better examples. The examples for transforms, for example, are rudimentary and scarcely hint at the actual complexity of the CSS specification.

Where does this section belong in the Guidelines?

Originally, I thought it should be added to the end of the "Languages and Character Sets" front matter section, but I no longer think so; the draft contains examples of TEI encoding which wouldn't make sense to someone who has not yet actually read the body of the Guidelines.