BPG Feedback on Complete Draft

From TEIWiki
Revision as of 18:15, 11 April 2009 by Natasha (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Back to GBP

The main sections of the BPG are outlined below to facilitate orderly feedback :-). Please provide feedback by Saturday, April 11th so Kevin and I have enough time to compile any of the more significant issues for discussion during our upcoming meeting on April 14th.

Add each new comment as a bullet point and be sure to attribute comments so we know how to follow-up if there's some debate. For example:

Introduction

  • Task Force w/c though historically correct may lose context in this new revision. Consider something more generic like "Working Group" or past tense: "the Task Force attempted to make these ..." Mdalmau

General Recommendations

  • Conisder moving facsimile page image info here as the final bullet point. Mdalmau

Structure of a TEI Document

The TEI Header

Linking between encoded text and images of source documents

  • Consider moving this text up under the General Rec. section. Mdalmau
  • Do we need to say this: "The examples below use the former method." And do we want all examples to use @facs? I think we should mix it up since we are recommending both options. Mdalmau
    • Kevin suggested that we need more info for how to use xml:id with METS. I am not quite sure how to do this at-a-glance and any attempt at detail will lead us into a significant discussion about METS. Here are some things we can say, but may not all of them (and hopefully Chris P. can provide some guidance):
      • Use xml:id to locate content but not explicit representation of content
      • fileSec used to explicitly list all the images (master, jpg, pdf)
      • structMap orders the pages by page break and references each image defined in fileSec Mdalmau
      • I changed 'the Open Access Initiative (OAI)" to "the Open Archives Initiative (OAI)". Unless there is another initiative that I do not know about.Natasha

LEVEL 1: Fully Automated Conversion and Encoding

LEVEL 2: Minimal Encoding

LEVEL 3: Simple Analysis

General Level 3 Recommendations

  • Need to explain more about how to encode end-of-division notes. They need an n= attribute, but they also need a ptr in the text.
  • Use of the "n" attribute for <l> should be optional. Remove from example? Or add optional information to the table? Mdalmau (reported by Rich)

LEVEL 4: Basic Content Analysis

  • For name tagging, recommend the use of @ref when the target is web accessible and @key when not. Mdalmau
  • Matt has provided an @key example; some possible debate about where the explanation appears in the Header Mdalmau

LEVEL 5: Scholarly Encoding Projects

General Guidelines for Attribute Usage

Acknowledgements

Appendix A: History of this Document