Difference between revisions of "Council-licensing"

From TEIWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎Not Software: also added boilerplate to each page generated by OpenCMS)
 
(16 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
[[Category:Council]]
 
[[Category:Council]]
−
[[Council]] is looking at regularising/standardising the licences it uses for various bits of output:
+
[[Council]] is looking at regularising/standardising the licences it uses for various bits of output of the TEI-C. Eventually it recommended to the [[Board]] that it dual license everything with [http://www.opensource.org/licenses/BSD-2-Clause BSD 2-Clause] and [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ Creative Commons Attribution CC+BY 3.0]. Users can choose which license is most appropriate in their situation/use of materials, and use that. In both cases it is Attribution of materials used that is asked.
  
 +
== Software ==
 
{| border="1" align="center" style="text-align:center;" cellpadding="10px;"
 
{| border="1" align="center" style="text-align:center;" cellpadding="10px;"
 
|- style="background-color:#AAF; font-weight:bold"
 
|- style="background-color:#AAF; font-weight:bold"
 
|Object
 
|Object
−
|'''Current Licence'''
+
|'''Previous Licence'''
 +
|'''Proposed Licence'''
 +
|'''To be updated?  By whom?  Status?'''
 +
|-
 +
|Stylesheets
 +
|[http://www.gnu.org/licenses/lgpl-2.1.html GNU LGPL 2.1]
 +
|[http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ CC+BY 3.0] and [http://www.opensource.org/licenses/bsd-license.php BSD 2-Clause]
 +
|dual CC / BSD.  Sebastian Rahtz.  Done on 2011-11-05. Let him know if any are missing the new licenses.
 +
|-
 +
|Roma
 +
| GPL
 +
| [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ CC+BY 3.0] and [http://www.opensource.org/licenses/bsd-license.php BSD 2-Clause]
 +
|dual CC / BSD.  Sebastian Rahtz.  Done on 2011-11-05. Let him know if any are missing the new licenses.
 +
|-
 +
|Exemplars
 +
| misc
 +
|[http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ CC+BY 3.0] and [http://www.opensource.org/licenses/bsd-license.php BSD 2-Clause]
 +
|dual CC / BSD.  Sebastian Rahtz.  Done on 2011-11-05. Let him know if any are missing the new licenses.
 +
|-
 +
| TEIOO
 +
| [http://www.gnu.org/licenses/lgpl-2.1.html GNU LGPL 2.1] <br/>(though LICENSE file has [http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-2.0.html GNU GPL 2.0])
 +
| [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ CC+BY 3.0] and [http://www.opensource.org/licenses/bsd-license.php BSD 2-Clause]
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
| Vesta
 +
| GPL
 +
| [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ CC+BY 3.0] and [http://www.opensource.org/licenses/bsd-license.php BSD 2-Clause]
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
| PassiveTeX (SR/Oxford) <br/>(Should probably be removed from TEI-C repository?)
 +
| 'Free' in LICENSE but 'COPYING' file has [http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-2.0.html GNU GPL 2.0]
 +
|  ??
 +
|
 +
|}
 +
 
 +
== Not Software ==
 +
{| border="1" align="center" style="text-align:center;" cellpadding="10px;"
 +
|- style="background-color:#AAF; font-weight:bold"
 +
|Object
 +
|'''Previous Licence'''
 
|'''Proposed Licence'''
 
|'''Proposed Licence'''
 +
|'''To be updated?  By whom?  Status?'''
 
|-
 
|-
−
|Guidelines
+
|Guidelines (ODD source)
 
|[http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-2.0.html GNU GPL 2.0]
 
|[http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-2.0.html GNU GPL 2.0]
−
|[http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/gpl.html GNU GPL 3.0]??
+
|[http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ CC+BY 3.0] and [http://www.opensource.org/licenses/bsd-license.php BSD 2-Clause]
 +
|
 
|-
 
|-
−
|Stylesheets
+
|Guidelines (official HTML release)
−
|[http://www.gnu.org/licenses/lgpl-2.1.html GNU LGPL 2.1]
+
|[http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-2.0.html GNU GPL 2.0]
−
|[http://www.gnu.org/licenses/lgpl.html GNU LGPL 3.0]
+
|[http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ CC+BY 3.0] and [http://www.opensource.org/licenses/bsd-license.php BSD 2-Clause]
 +
|
 
|-
 
|-
 
|Sample ODDs
 
|Sample ODDs
 
| 'free' <br/>(mostly but some GPL exceptions <br/>like teilite and tei_enrich, <br/> and tei_tite is unlicensed)
 
| 'free' <br/>(mostly but some GPL exceptions <br/>like teilite and tei_enrich, <br/> and tei_tite is unlicensed)
−
| ?? CC0? LGPL? CC+By
+
| [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ CC+BY 3.0] and [http://www.opensource.org/licenses/bsd-license.php BSD 2-Clause]
 +
|
 
|-
 
|-
 
|Pre-generated Schemas
 
|Pre-generated Schemas
 
| 'free' (mostly)
 
| 'free' (mostly)
−
| ?? CC0? LGPL? CC+By
+
| [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ CC+BY 3.0] and [http://www.opensource.org/licenses/bsd-license.php BSD 2-Clause]
 +
|
 
|-
 
|-
 
|Roma-generated Schemas
 
|Roma-generated Schemas
 
| Content of &lt;availability&gt;
 
| Content of &lt;availability&gt;
−
| ??
+
| Content of &lt;availability&gt;
−
|-
+
|
−
|Roma
 
−
| GPL
 
−
| ?? (LGPL 3.0?)
 
−
|-
 
−
| TEIOO
 
−
| GNU LGPL 2.1 <br/>(though LICENSE file has GPL 2.0)
 
−
| GNU LGPL 3.0?
 
 
|-
 
|-
 
|Wiki  
 
|Wiki  
−
|GNU FDL 1.2
+
|[http://www.gnu.org/licenses/fdl-1.2.html GNU FDL 1.2]
−
|GNU FDL 1.3
+
|[http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ CC+BY 3.0] and [http://www.opensource.org/licenses/bsd-license.php BSD 2-Clause]
−
|-
+
|[[User:James | James]] will update LocalSettings.php to point to http://www.tei-c.org/Guidelines/access.xml#body.1_div.2 which will be changed to reflect new dual-license.
−
| jTEI
 
−
| CC+by+nd 3.0
 
−
| CC+by+nd 3.0
 
 
|-
 
|-
 
| TEI-C Website <br/>(other than Guidelines)
 
| TEI-C Website <br/>(other than Guidelines)
−
| Unlicensed
+
| Varies by page, but many unlicensed
−
| ??
+
| [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ CC+BY 3.0] and [http://www.opensource.org/licenses/bsd-license.php BSD 2-Clause]
−
|-
+
| [[User:James | James]] will update http://www.tei-c.org/Guidelines/access.xml#body.1_div.2 to reflect new dual-license.  This now says "most materials", so if any page has other terms, those would take precedence. Update by [[User:Kshawkin|Kshawkin]] 04:37, 18 April 2018 (CEST): also revised http://www.tei-c.org/About/website.xml . Another update by [[User:Kshawkin|Kshawkin]] 20:49, 21 April 2018 (CEST): also added boilerplate text to bottom of each page generated by OpenCMS.
−
| Vesta
 
−
| GPL
 
−
| GPL 3.0
 
 
|-  
 
|-  
 
| TEI CSS
 
| TEI CSS
 
| none
 
| none
−
| ??
+
| [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ CC+BY 3.0] and [http://www.opensource.org/licenses/BSD-2-Clause BSD 2-Clause]
 +
|
 
|-
 
|-
−
| PassiveTeX (SR/Oxford) <br/>(Should probably be removed from TEI-C repository?)
+
| TEI-ISO Feature Structure Representation (ch. 18)
−
| 'Free' in LICENSE but 'COPYING' file has GPL 2.0
+
| [http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-2.0.html GNU GPL 2.0]
−
| ??
+
| [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ CC+BY 3.0] and [http://www.opensource.org/licenses/bsd-license.php BSD 2-Clause]
 +
|
 +
|}
 +
 
 +
== Not under consideration ==
 +
{| border="1" align="center" style="text-align:center;" cellpadding="10px;"
 +
|- style="background-color:#AAF; font-weight:bold"
 +
|Object
 +
|'''Current Licence'''
 +
|'''Proposed Licence'''
 +
|-
 +
| jTEI
 +
| [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/ CC+by+nd 3.0]
 +
| [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/ CC+by+nd 3.0]
 
|}
 
|}

Latest revision as of 19:49, 21 April 2018

Council is looking at regularising/standardising the licences it uses for various bits of output of the TEI-C. Eventually it recommended to the Board that it dual license everything with BSD 2-Clause and Creative Commons Attribution CC+BY 3.0. Users can choose which license is most appropriate in their situation/use of materials, and use that. In both cases it is Attribution of materials used that is asked.

Software

Object Previous Licence Proposed Licence To be updated? By whom? Status?
Stylesheets GNU LGPL 2.1 CC+BY 3.0 and BSD 2-Clause dual CC / BSD. Sebastian Rahtz. Done on 2011-11-05. Let him know if any are missing the new licenses.
Roma GPL CC+BY 3.0 and BSD 2-Clause dual CC / BSD. Sebastian Rahtz. Done on 2011-11-05. Let him know if any are missing the new licenses.
Exemplars misc CC+BY 3.0 and BSD 2-Clause dual CC / BSD. Sebastian Rahtz. Done on 2011-11-05. Let him know if any are missing the new licenses.
TEIOO GNU LGPL 2.1
(though LICENSE file has GNU GPL 2.0) 		CC+BY 3.0 and BSD 2-Clause
Vesta GPL CC+BY 3.0 and BSD 2-Clause
PassiveTeX (SR/Oxford)
(Should probably be removed from TEI-C repository?) 		'Free' in LICENSE but 'COPYING' file has GNU GPL 2.0 ??

Not Software

Object Previous Licence Proposed Licence To be updated? By whom? Status?
Guidelines (ODD source) GNU GPL 2.0 CC+BY 3.0 and BSD 2-Clause
Guidelines (official HTML release) GNU GPL 2.0 CC+BY 3.0 and BSD 2-Clause
Sample ODDs 'free'
(mostly but some GPL exceptions
like teilite and tei_enrich,
and tei_tite is unlicensed) 		CC+BY 3.0 and BSD 2-Clause
Pre-generated Schemas 'free' (mostly) CC+BY 3.0 and BSD 2-Clause
Roma-generated Schemas Content of <availability> Content of <availability>
Wiki GNU FDL 1.2 CC+BY 3.0 and BSD 2-Clause James will update LocalSettings.php to point to http://www.tei-c.org/Guidelines/access.xml#body.1_div.2 which will be changed to reflect new dual-license.
TEI-C Website
(other than Guidelines) 		Varies by page, but many unlicensed CC+BY 3.0 and BSD 2-Clause James will update http://www.tei-c.org/Guidelines/access.xml#body.1_div.2 to reflect new dual-license. This now says "most materials", so if any page has other terms, those would take precedence. Update by Kshawkin 04:37, 18 April 2018 (CEST): also revised http://www.tei-c.org/About/website.xml . Another update by Kshawkin 20:49, 21 April 2018 (CEST): also added boilerplate text to bottom of each page generated by OpenCMS.
TEI CSS none CC+BY 3.0 and BSD 2-Clause
TEI-ISO Feature Structure Representation (ch. 18) GNU GPL 2.0 CC+BY 3.0 and BSD 2-Clause

Not under consideration

Object Current Licence Proposed Licence
jTEI CC+by+nd 3.0 CC+by+nd 3.0
Retrieved from "https://wiki.tei-c.org/index.php?title=Council-licensing&oldid=16205"