Difference between revisions of "Host Proposals Review Criteria and Guidelines"

From TEIWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "Reference the Call for Host when reviewing applications: http://members.tei-c.org/hosting. # Location # Venue # Staffing # Funding Prospects # Supporting organizations (if re...")
 
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Reference the Call for Host when reviewing applications: http://members.tei-c.org/hosting.  
+
* Reference the Call for Host when reviewing applications: http://members.tei-c.org/hosting.  
 
+
--------
 +
* Template for review: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BxFnLn8g8TOYVk1NMm55ZWxWeWs/view?usp=sharing (password protected)
 +
* Host documentation, including submitted proposals: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/0BxFnLn8g8TOYM0NfM3NmRml0LVE?usp=sharing (password protected)
 +
--------
 
# Location
 
# Location
 
# Venue
 
# Venue
Line 13: Line 16:
 
* Foreseen challenges?
 
* Foreseen challenges?
 
* Special opportunities?
 
* Special opportunities?
 +
--------
 +
Each voting member of the Board of Directors most complete the review.  Non-voting members are welcome to complete the review of applications.  Input from non-voting members will be taken under consideration by voting members of the Board.
  
Each voting member of the Board of Directors most complete the review.  Non-voting members are welcome to complete the review of applications.  Input from non-voting members will be taken under consideration by voting members of the Board.
+
Criteria 1-8 should be assigned a rating each that will average across all objective criteria (1-8):
 +
 
 +
* 5 = Very Good
 +
* 4 = Good
 +
* 3 = Satisfactory
 +
* 2 = Poor
 +
* 1 = Very Poor
 +
 
 +
Qualitative responses to foreseen challenges and special opportunities will be used as part of our discussion and overall consideration.
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
[[Category:Board]]

Latest revision as of 21:38, 6 June 2017



  1. Location
  2. Venue
  3. Staffing
  4. Funding Prospects
  5. Supporting organizations (if relevant)
  6. Ease of travel
  7. Opportunities to expand the TEI community
  8. Has hosted conference in the past?

  • Questions for Host?
  • Foreseen challenges?
  • Special opportunities?

Each voting member of the Board of Directors most complete the review. Non-voting members are welcome to complete the review of applications. Input from non-voting members will be taken under consideration by voting members of the Board.

Criteria 1-8 should be assigned a rating each that will average across all objective criteria (1-8):

  • 5 = Very Good
  • 4 = Good
  • 3 = Satisfactory
  • 2 = Poor
  • 1 = Very Poor

Qualitative responses to foreseen challenges and special opportunities will be used as part of our discussion and overall consideration.