TEI Libraries SIG Manifesto: Difference between revisions

From TEIWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Created page with "Here is our initial outline of a manifesto that states rationales that library administration leaders should consider for supporting TEI. We welcome all comments, edits, and sug..."
 
Line 4: Line 4:
==Outline==
==Outline==


    Preamble
Preamble
  Rationale for digitizing (in one sentence): why we make things digital … first principles. Reference CLIR docs.
Rationale for digitizing (in one sentence): why we make things digital … first principles. Reference CLIR docs.
    For different intended uses of content, different types of access mechanisms are needed.
For different intended uses of content, different types of access mechanisms are needed.
    While mass digitization meets many common needs, it’s insufficient for certain purposes, such as:
While mass digitization meets many common needs, it’s insufficient for certain purposes, such as:
        Things that don’t OCR (especially manuscripts and early printed works) and/or are illegible or hard to read in the page image
Things that don’t OCR (especially manuscripts and early printed works) and/or are illegible or hard to read in the page image
        Source documents that can’t be scanned because they’re too fragile
Source documents that can’t be scanned because they’re too fragile
        Reference works where you want to be able to search on a headword
Reference works where you want to be able to search on a headword
        ????
????
    For such things, we still need a non-proprietary format for representing a digital surrogate of the item that is designed for
 
        long-term preservation
For such things, we still need a non-proprietary format for representing a digital surrogate of the item that is designed for   long-term preservation
        data curation
data curation
        interchange
interchange


and which will enable
and which will enable
::visualization
::analysis


        visualization
For textual content, the obvious choice is TEI.
        analysis
TEI encoding can be scoped: you don’t have to (and shouldn’t!) use all of its features.
 
Encoding is often outsourced, including through AccessTEI. If your project calls for richer encoding, can enrich the outsourced data by doing the higher-level encoding in house.
    For textual content, the obvious choice is TEI.
    TEI encoding can be scoped: you don’t have to (and shouldn’t!) use all of its features.
    Encoding is often outsourced, including through AccessTEI. If your project calls for richer encoding, can enrich the outsourced data by doing the higher-level encoding in house.

Revision as of 18:05, 9 November 2012

Here is our initial outline of a manifesto that states rationales that library administration leaders should consider for supporting TEI. We welcome all comments, edits, and suggested changes!


Outline

Preamble Rationale for digitizing (in one sentence): why we make things digital … first principles. Reference CLIR docs. For different intended uses of content, different types of access mechanisms are needed. While mass digitization meets many common needs, it’s insufficient for certain purposes, such as: Things that don’t OCR (especially manuscripts and early printed works) and/or are illegible or hard to read in the page image Source documents that can’t be scanned because they’re too fragile Reference works where you want to be able to search on a headword ????

For such things, we still need a non-proprietary format for representing a digital surrogate of the item that is designed for long-term preservation data curation interchange

and which will enable

visualization
analysis

For textual content, the obvious choice is TEI. TEI encoding can be scoped: you don’t have to (and shouldn’t!) use all of its features. Encoding is often outsourced, including through AccessTEI. If your project calls for richer encoding, can enrich the outsourced data by doing the higher-level encoding in house.