Sandbox for Genetic Editing: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
*@change | *@change | ||
*@instant | *@instant | ||
The page is not confined to issues of ‘genetic’ editing. Any problems of ‘diplomatic’ or ‘documentary’ transcriptions of manuscripts, be they modern, medieval or ancient, may be addressed here. | |||
Also, the well-established elements and attributes need to discussed as their use is in many ways affected by the new ones. | |||
==Bibliography== | ==Bibliography== | ||
Revision as of 10:23, 11 October 2013
The purpose of this page is to discuss any issues of the with chapter 11 of version 2 of TEI P5, especially the elements and attributes which have been newly introduced in this version in the wake of the draft proposal “An Encoding Model for Genetic Editions”:
- <line>
- <listChange>
- <metamark>
- <mod>
- <redo>
- <retrace>
- <sourceDoc>
- <substJoin>
- <surfaceGrp>
- <transpose>
- <undo>
- @change
- @instant
The page is not confined to issues of ‘genetic’ editing. Any problems of ‘diplomatic’ or ‘documentary’ transcriptions of manuscripts, be they modern, medieval or ancient, may be addressed here.
Also, the well-established elements and attributes need to discussed as their use is in many ways affected by the new ones.
Bibliography
Brüning, Gerrit, Katrin Henzel, and Dietmar Pravida. 2013. “Multiple Encoding in Genetic Editions: The Case of ‘Faust’.” In Journal of the Text Encoding Initiative [Online] 4. URL: http://jtei.revues.org/697; DOI: 10.4000/jtei.697.
Robinson, Peter. 2013. “Towards a Theory of Digital Editions.” In Variants 10: 105–31.