Difference between revisions of "Host Proposals Review Criteria and Guidelines"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
* Foreseen challenges? | * Foreseen challenges? | ||
* Special opportunities? | * Special opportunities? | ||
| − | + | -------- | |
Each voting member of the Board of Directors most complete the review. Non-voting members are welcome to complete the review of applications. Input from non-voting members will be taken under consideration by voting members of the Board. | Each voting member of the Board of Directors most complete the review. Non-voting members are welcome to complete the review of applications. Input from non-voting members will be taken under consideration by voting members of the Board. | ||
Revision as of 01:11, 29 May 2017
Reference the Call for Host when reviewing applications: http://members.tei-c.org/hosting.
- Location
- Venue
- Staffing
- Funding Prospects
- Supporting organizations (if relevant)
- Ease of travel
- Opportunities to expand the TEI community
- Has hosted conference in the past?
- Questions for Host?
- Foreseen challenges?
- Special opportunities?
Each voting member of the Board of Directors most complete the review. Non-voting members are welcome to complete the review of applications. Input from non-voting members will be taken under consideration by voting members of the Board.
Criteria 1-8 should be assigned a rating each that will average across all objective criteria (1-8):
- 5 = Very Good
- 4 = Good
- 3 = Satisfactory
- 2 = Poor
- 1 = Very Poor
Qualitative responses to foreseen challenges and special opportunities will be used as part of our discussion and overall consideration.
