Difference between revisions of "Level 2 Prose Documentation Feedback"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Tester: Melanie Schlosser: responses) |
m (removed unused templates for feedback) |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
: Syd and Kevin are puzzled as to why this was changed. We'll return to this. | : Syd and Kevin are puzzled as to why this was changed. We'll return to this. | ||
* I didn't look at anything on the ODD after the 2nd example. | * I didn't look at anything on the ODD after the 2nd example. | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
Revision as of 20:36, 5 July 2011
>>Return to testing instructions: Feedback_on_the_Best_Practices_for_TEI_in_Libraries_ODD_Documentation_and_Schemas
Tester: Melanie Schlosser
Comments/Feedback
- Extra sentence in the ODD file under 'Reference': "Note that this is a ‘syntactically conformant’ customization, in that documents that are valid against this scheme will also be valid against the TEI_all schema. However, it is unkown whether or not it is truly ‘TEI conformant’, as the TEI Guidelines do not make clear whether or not encoding of individual paragraphs is mandatory."
- This was an intentional addition. (Kshawkin 14:36, 5 July 2011 (EDT))
- Example 1: Same comment about the Header element as in level 1.
- Fixed.
- Example 1: The child elements of the optional 'front' element are missing.
- Syd and Kevin are puzzled as to why this was changed. We'll return to this.
- Example 1: Information missing from 'back' illustration: "organized like <front>, with 1 or more or <div1>,each with a single <ab>"
- Syd and Kevin are puzzled as to why this was changed. We'll return to this.
- I didn't look at anything on the ODD after the 2nd example.
