Minutes for June 30, 2009

Attendees: Renee, Glen, Rich, Kevin, Michelle

Renee:

• Changes based on Vitus' comments
• MARC record for the TEI document is based on the TEI document (534 field)
• Renee incorp. Vitus' suggestions; needed to account in the mapping for two approaches for cataloging the TEI doc
  • 533 field to capture as reproduction
    • Cataloging microfilm repro. of the book; body of the bib. record represents the book; the 533 captures the microfilm portion
  • 534 field to capture the TEI document; the TEI description is based on the TEI document solely
• Renee's personal preference is that we get a more consistent description base the description on the TEI document; use 534 field

in the source document

• • 533 accomodates limited metadata about the reproduction

Glen:

• 533 is structured?
• Has subfields.
• Do 533 and 534 have parallel structures?

Glen:

• Feels that some notes can be moved down into a "table" footnote to explain the 533 and 534.

Kevin:

• Summarizes surrograte cataloging; 2 practices:
  • 533 field: the whole rest of the MARC record describes the source doc; give brief info about surrogate
  • 534 field: describes mostly the MARC the TEI document

Glen:

• Our approach with best practices does not assume that a library does not have the source document; so it's better to have

the TEI document as the source for description (thus the 534 approach)

• Kevin also supports 534

• Only 3 fields left that have 533 mappings: date of pub for TEI document, seriesStmt title level ="f" and publisher of TEI document
• Renee can adjust the mappings if we all agree to treat the TEI document as source