Council-licensing
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Council is looking at regularising/standardising the licences it uses for various bits of output of the TEI-C. Eventually it recommended to the Board that it dual license everything with BSD 2-Clause and Creative Commons Attribution. Users can choose which license is most appropriate in their situation/use of materials, and use that. In both cases it is Attribution of materials used that is asked.
Software
| Object | Previous Licence | Proposed Licence | To be updated? By whom? Status? |
| Stylesheets | GNU LGPL 2.1 | CC+BY 3.0 and BSD 2-Clause | |
| Roma | GPL | CC+BY 3.0 and BSD 2-Clause | |
| TEIOO | GNU LGPL 2.1 (though LICENSE file has GNU GPL 2.0) |
CC+BY 3.0 and BSD 2-Clause | |
| Vesta | GPL | CC+BY 3.0 and BSD 2-Clause | |
| PassiveTeX (SR/Oxford) (Should probably be removed from TEI-C repository?) |
'Free' in LICENSE but 'COPYING' file has GNU GPL 2.0 | ?? |
Not Software
| Object | Previous Licence | Proposed Licence | To be updated? By whom? Status? |
| Guidelines (ODD source) | GNU GPL 2.0 | CC+BY 3.0 and BSD 2-Clause | |
| Guidelines (official HTML release) | GNU GPL 2.0 | CC+BY 3.0 and BSD 2-Clause | |
| Sample ODDs | 'free' (mostly but some GPL exceptions like teilite and tei_enrich, and tei_tite is unlicensed) |
CC+BY 3.0 and BSD 2-Clause | |
| Pre-generated Schemas | 'free' (mostly) | CC+BY 3.0 and BSD 2-Clause | |
| Roma-generated Schemas | Content of <availability> | Content of <availability> | |
| Wiki | GNU FDL 1.2 | CC+BY 3.0 and BSD 2-Clause | |
| TEI-C Website (other than Guidelines) |
Unlicensed | CC+BY 3.0 and BSD 2-Clause | |
| TEI CSS | none | CC+BY 3.0 and BSD 2-Clause |
Not under consideration
| Object | Current Licence | Proposed Licence |
| jTEI | CC+by+nd 3.0 | CC+by+nd 3.0 |
