TEI Libraries SIG Manifesto
Revision as of 20:01, 9 November 2012 by Harriett Green (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Here is our initial outline of a manifesto that states rationales that library administration leaders should consider for supporting TEI. We welcome all comments, edits, and sug...")
Here is our initial outline of a manifesto that states rationales that library administration leaders should consider for supporting TEI. We welcome all comments, edits, and suggested changes!
Outline
Preamble Rationale for digitizing (in one sentence): why we make things digital … first principles. Reference CLIR docs. For different intended uses of content, different types of access mechanisms are needed. While mass digitization meets many common needs, it’s insufficient for certain purposes, such as: Things that don’t OCR (especially manuscripts and early printed works) and/or are illegible or hard to read in the page image Source documents that can’t be scanned because they’re too fragile Reference works where you want to be able to search on a headword ???? For such things, we still need a non-proprietary format for representing a digital surrogate of the item that is designed for long-term preservation data curation interchange
and which will enable
visualization analysis
For textual content, the obvious choice is TEI. TEI encoding can be scoped: you don’t have to (and shouldn’t!) use all of its features. Encoding is often outsourced, including through AccessTEI. If your project calls for richer encoding, can enrich the outsourced data by doing the higher-level encoding in house.