Difference between revisions of "SIGMS Minutes 20111014"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
* Marjorie Burghardt (MB) | * Marjorie Burghardt (MB) | ||
* Torsten Schaßan (TS) | * Torsten Schaßan (TS) | ||
| + | * Christian Wittern (CW) | ||
* Gregor Middell (GM) – minutes | * Gregor Middell (GM) – minutes | ||
... | ... | ||
| Line 23: | Line 24: | ||
* support for marginal notes in the Guidelines/ SIG proposal | * support for marginal notes in the Guidelines/ SIG proposal | ||
* manuscript description: <summary/> content model is not flexible enough for more complex descriptions (e.g. <p/>) | * manuscript description: <summary/> content model is not flexible enough for more complex descriptions (e.g. <p/>) | ||
| + | * CW: there are – apart from the SIG – means to address such issues, for example the [http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?atid=644065&group_id=106328&func=browse Sourceforge Issue Tracker] | ||
| + | * EP: SIG can act as a proxy though | ||
Revision as of 09:59, 14 October 2011
Participants
- Elena Pierazzo (EP)
- Marjorie Burghardt (MB)
- Torsten Schaßan (TS)
- Christian Wittern (CW)
- Gregor Middell (GM) – minutes
...
Introduction (EP)
- introduction of participants
- explains relationship and interdependencies to other SIGs (Facsimile, Libraries, ...), willingness to contribute vs. ability to do so on a persistent basis, problem of time constraints, financial and other resources as well as attribution of work in the SIGs
- outline of current activities
- Genetic editing: Council adopts recommendations of the SIG WG, will be circulated for the first time shortly; likely to be included in the next release of the Guidelines
- Critical Apparatus: chapter in the Guidelines has not been revised since P4, automatic collation vs. manual construction of a CA, question of relationship between the two, MB appointed as leader of a WG to improve on this situation
- Manuscript description: extension of existing means with dimensions like time, geospatial information etc., problem of scope (to what extent are we talking about manuscripts or about cultural artifacts in general)
- organizational matters, some financial support by the TEI available, communication via mailing list, wiki and web-site
- call for participation
What should we do, what could you do?
- TS: ODDs from ENRICH project available
- support for marginal notes in the Guidelines/ SIG proposal
- manuscript description: <summary/> content model is not flexible enough for more complex descriptions (e.g. <p/>)
- CW: there are – apart from the SIG – means to address such issues, for example the Sourceforge Issue Tracker
- EP: SIG can act as a proxy though
