Outsourcing TEI-C Administrative Duties: Difference between revisions

From TEIWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Mdalmau (talk | contribs)
Created page with "==Overview== In 2015, the TEI-C Board of Directors considered a quote for outsourcing TEI-C administrative duties (aka "back office work") to a management company that specialize..."
 
Mdalmau (talk | contribs)
mNo edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
==Overview==
==Overview==
In 2015, the TEI-C Board of Directors considered a quote for outsourcing TEI-C administrative duties (aka "back office work") to a management company that specializes in supporting non-profits.  At the time, the Board considered amending the Bylaws, especially offices held by Board members in hopes that we could better manage the work in-house.  In 2016, the Board revisited this discussion several times and decided it was once again worth exploring outsourcing options, even if only on a trial basis (2-3 years).  While we have not given up on amending the Bylaws to make the Board more efficient, we will revisit possible amendments based on a new round of quotes from management companies.   
In 2015, the TEI-C Board of Directors considered a quote for outsourcing TEI-C administrative duties (aka "back office work") to a management company that specializes in supporting non-profits.  At the time, the Board considered amending the Bylaws, especially offices held by Board members in hopes that we could better manage the work in-house.  In 2016, the Board revisited this discussion several times and decided it was once again worth exploring outsourcing options, even if only on a trial basis (2-3 years).  While we have not given up on [[Bylaws_Amendments_for_2016|amending the Bylaws]] to make the Board more efficient, we will revisit possible amendments based on a new round of quotes from management companies.   


[[Category:Board]]
[[Category:Board]]

Revision as of 02:18, 19 July 2016

Overview

In 2015, the TEI-C Board of Directors considered a quote for outsourcing TEI-C administrative duties (aka "back office work") to a management company that specializes in supporting non-profits. At the time, the Board considered amending the Bylaws, especially offices held by Board members in hopes that we could better manage the work in-house. In 2016, the Board revisited this discussion several times and decided it was once again worth exploring outsourcing options, even if only on a trial basis (2-3 years). While we have not given up on amending the Bylaws to make the Board more efficient, we will revisit possible amendments based on a new round of quotes from management companies.