Difference between revisions of "Council-licensing"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(splitting table) |
Stuartyeates (talk | contribs) (→Not Software) |
||
Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
|'''Proposed Licence''' | |'''Proposed Licence''' | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | |Guidelines | + | |Guidelines (ODD source) |
+ | |[http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-2.0.html GNU GPL 2.0] | ||
+ | |[http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/gpl.html GNU GPL 3.0]?? | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |Guidelines (official HTML release) | ||
|[http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-2.0.html GNU GPL 2.0] | |[http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-2.0.html GNU GPL 2.0] | ||
|[http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/gpl.html GNU GPL 3.0]?? | |[http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/gpl.html GNU GPL 3.0]?? | ||
Line 66: | Line 70: | ||
| ?? | | ?? | ||
|} | |} | ||
− | |||
== Not under consideration == | == Not under consideration == |
Revision as of 20:50, 29 September 2011
Council is looking at regularising/standardising the licences it uses for various bits of output of the TEI-C:
Software
Object | Current Licence | Proposed Licence |
Stylesheets | GNU LGPL 2.1 | GNU LGPL 3.0 |
Roma | GPL | ?? (GNU LGPL 3.0?) |
TEIOO | GNU LGPL 2.1 (though LICENSE file has GNU GPL 2.0) |
GNU GPL 3.0? |
Vesta | GPL | GNU GPL 3.0 |
PassiveTeX (SR/Oxford) (Should probably be removed from TEI-C repository?) |
'Free' in LICENSE but 'COPYING' file has GNU GPL 2.0 | ?? |
Not Software
Object | Current Licence | Proposed Licence |
Guidelines (ODD source) | GNU GPL 2.0 | GNU GPL 3.0?? |
Guidelines (official HTML release) | GNU GPL 2.0 | GNU GPL 3.0?? |
Sample ODDs | 'free' (mostly but some GPL exceptions like teilite and tei_enrich, and tei_tite is unlicensed) |
?? CC0? LGPL? CC+By |
Pre-generated Schemas | 'free' (mostly) | ?? CC0? LGPL? CC+By |
Roma-generated Schemas | Content of <availability> | ?? |
Wiki | GNU FDL 1.2 | GNU FDL 1.3 |
TEI-C Website (other than Guidelines) |
Unlicensed | ?? |
TEI CSS | none | ?? |
Not under consideration
Object | Current Licence | Proposed Licence |
jTEI | CC+by+nd 3.0 | CC+by+nd 3.0 |