MS SIG Agenda 2007: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
### What is misleading or incorrectly stated in the prose description of P5 Guidelines? | ### What is misleading or incorrectly stated in the prose description of P5 Guidelines? | ||
### Diplomatic/pseudo-facsimilar edition as a case study: do we have everything we need? | ### Diplomatic/pseudo-facsimilar edition as a case study: do we have everything we need? | ||
### Corrections/additions/substitution vs. critical apparatus. | |||
### '''Enhancement proposals''' | ### '''Enhancement proposals''' | ||
# Plenary discussion, groups report | # Plenary discussion, groups report | ||
# Enhancement proposals | # Enhancement proposals: list and priorities | ||
# Work volunteering | # Work volunteering | ||
# What will happen after the meeting? | |||
Revision as of 20:53, 2 November 2007
MS-SIG 2008 meeting Agenda
- Greetings and presentations
- Groups work on the TEI modules that concern manuscripts, that are:
- MS description
- Critical apparatus
- Representation of Primary Sources
- Topic for the discussion Modern MSS - Medieval MSS:
- P5 novelties: in which way they solve issues not covered by P4?
- What is still missing?
- What is misleading or incorrectly stated in the prose description of P5 Guidelines?
- Diplomatic/pseudo-facsimilar edition as a case study: do we have everything we need?
- Corrections/additions/substitution vs. critical apparatus.
- Enhancement proposals
- Plenary discussion, groups report
- Enhancement proposals: list and priorities
- Work volunteering
- What will happen after the meeting?