Collection of Postscript-Examples: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Joachim Veit (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Joachim Veit (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
* [[C. M. v. Weber an Johann Gänsbacher, Munich, 27th June 1811]]: Normal Postscript without label | * [[C. M. v. Weber an Johann Gänsbacher, Munich, 27th June 1811]]: Normal Postscript without label | ||
* [[C. M. v. Weber an Gottfried Weber, Darmstadt, 15th January 1811]]: Short Postscript without label and addition by Giacomo Meyerbeer | |||
* [[C. M. v. Weber an Johann Gänsbacher, Berlin, 29th February 1812]]: Complex Postscript with label (hypothetical, but nevertheless realistic example) | * [[C. M. v. Weber an Johann Gänsbacher, Berlin, 29th February 1812]]: Complex Postscript with label (hypothetical, but nevertheless realistic example) | ||
* [[C. M. v. Weber an Gottfried Weber, Augsburg, 10th March 1811]]: Special Case: Circular Letter with additions (not really postscripts) | * [[C. M. v. Weber an Gottfried Weber, Augsburg, 10th March 1811]]: Special Case: Circular Letter with additions (not really postscripts) | ||
Revision as of 20:35, 2 January 2009
[This is intended as a collection of examples of "normal" and of really problematic "postscripts". You are invited to add further examples with oder without encoding.]
List of Examples
- C. M. v. Weber an Johann Gänsbacher, Munich, 27th June 1811: Normal Postscript without label
- C. M. v. Weber an Gottfried Weber, Darmstadt, 15th January 1811: Short Postscript without label and addition by Giacomo Meyerbeer
- C. M. v. Weber an Johann Gänsbacher, Berlin, 29th February 1812: Complex Postscript with label (hypothetical, but nevertheless realistic example)
- C. M. v. Weber an Gottfried Weber, Augsburg, 10th March 1811: Special Case: Circular Letter with additions (not really postscripts)