Collection of Postscript-Examples: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Joachim Veit (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Joachim Veit (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Category: Postscript encoding|*]] | [[Category: Postscript encoding|*]] | ||
[This is intended as a collection of examples of "normal" and of really problematic "postscripts". You are invited to add further examples with oder without encoding.] | [This is intended as a collection of examples of "normal" and of really problematic "postscripts". You are invited to add further examples with oder without encoding or to add alternative encoding-proposals.] | ||
==List of Examples== | ==List of Examples== | ||
Revision as of 20:47, 2 January 2009
[This is intended as a collection of examples of "normal" and of really problematic "postscripts". You are invited to add further examples with oder without encoding or to add alternative encoding-proposals.]
List of Examples
- C. M. v. Weber an Johann Gänsbacher, Munich, 27th June 1811: Normal Postscript without label
- C. M. v. Weber an Gottfried Weber, Darmstadt, 15th January 1811: Short Postscript without label and addition by Giacomo Meyerbeer
- C. M. v. Weber an Johann Gänsbacher, Berlin, 29th February 1812: Complex Postscript with label (hypothetical, but nevertheless realistic example)
- C. M. v. Weber an Gottfried Weber, Augsburg, 10th March 1811: Special Case: Circular Letter with additions (not really postscripts)